N8WUNZ 20230308 (W) The Wicked On The Run

The main ideas from this information are that the speaker believes there is a terrorist situation in New Zealand and that the government has allowed terrorists into the country without vaccination. They provide details about the Lebanese Hezbollah's military wing and their history of terrorist activity. The speaker also mentions an alliance with Project PAL, a class action lawsuit, and calls for police involvement in investigating the authority of those who administered the vaccine. They also mention the need for lawyers with integrity and the possibility of going to court without licenses. They believe that the police should be informed about the lack of authority to administer the vaccine. Okay. Right, well, good evening everybody and thank you all for tuning up. Oh, I'll let you in. I'll keep an eye on that. I've got to talk and let people in and look at your chats and it's going to be a bit of a busy evening for me. But I thought we'd, the title tonight is The Wicked are on the Run. And they have been so wicked, you will be absolutely amazed. Now, you know how I talked about, I'm going to talk about terrorism. You know how we've got all these silly people talking about the freedom fighters as being some sort of terrorist. It's called projection. Do you recall, guys, I talked about how back in 2021, I found an order, a border order, that was deep in schedule 10 of that border order, were the people who were allowed to enter our country without being backed. Now, we all know that New Zealand citizens could. We all know that Australians who've lived here for a long time, lived here most of the time, could. We knew that most people with permanent visas could. But the two standouts at that time were people from Afghanistan and people from the Crimea. Ukraine, sorry. From the Ukraine. Ukrainians could come into this country without having a vaccine. Okay. So that really shook me up because what I found in the course of going over my favourite magazine, the New Zealand Gazette, was all of these designations of terrorists. And designations that start off in the first place. I'm going to read you a little bit out of a statement of case to designate Lebanese Hezbollah's military wing, which has got a long Arabic name, the Islamic Resistance, so shortened to IR, as a terrorist entity. This is in our country. These are people who were admitted into our country probably without a vaccine. Some of them. Just recently. But this was, I think, started out, the first statement of case to designate the Lebanese Hezbollah military wing was, I think, about 2009. So then they get re-designated every three years. This is the sort of stuff, right? Let's just go to paragraph 17. The guerrilla warfare element comprises four operational subunits. A martyr's unit responsible for suicide operations. A special forces unit responsible for sniping, anti-tank activities, surveillance, communications and bomb-making. Three, a heavy weapons unit responsible for rocketry and mortars. And A, a regulars and support unit. Now we've probably got support units in this country, being people who send money off to them, okay? Paragraph 19. Little is known about IR's internal command hierarchy due to its highly secretive nature and use of sophisticated protective measures. However, yeah, this must have been 2009. However, it is thought that prior to his death in 2008, Imad Mugh, somebody, was one of the key leaders and held primary responsibility for conducting special operations against Israel for forging close links with and providing support to Palestinian militant groups and supporting the Shia Māori army in Iraq. He was assassinated in a car bomb attack in Damascus in February 2008. Okay, you'll notice, and I'm not sure what year it was now, but I think it was probably about 20, it was while Jacinda was in power, so maybe it was it was early 2017. When Trump moved the industry to Jerusalem, the Israeli diplomats got chucked out of New Zealand. Okay. Okay, what sort of things do they do? Tactics. From 1982 to 2006. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Hezbollah was implicated in dozens of attacks against Israel, the United States, and other Western targets in the Middle East, Europe, and South America. These attacks included a series of kidnappings of Westerners in Lebanon, suicide truck bombings against the U.S. Embassy, French paratroopers in the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut that killed more than 300 people. In 1983, bombings in Copenhagen and Paris. In 1985, the hijacking of PWA flight 847 with the death of a U.S. citizen. In 1995, the bombing of the Israeli Embassy in Argentina that killed 29 people. In 1992, the bombing of a Jewish community center in Argentina that killed 95. In 1994, Hezbollah is also being linked to the 1996 truck bombing of the Colbar Towers in Saudi Arabia that killed 19 U.S. servicemen and one Saudi national. Okay. Prelude to the 2006 war with Israel. Terra plot. We'll just go on to 32. Terra plot. You can all get these guys. You go to the New Zealand Gazette. Put in designation. Put in, and you'll find a link to statement of case. Okay. And there are lists that are in the police website. Okay. Since 2008, however, there is clear evidence that IR has reengaged with planning terrorist attacks against Israel. Israeli interests are broad. Alleged plots have been disrupted in several countries, including Abizajan, Turkey, and Israel. In April this year, Egyptian court convicted 26 men of belonging to Hezbollah cell that was planning to attack Israeli tourists in the Sinai Peninsula. Fire on ships passing through the Suez Canal and smuggled weapons, supplies, and people through the Gaza Tunnel. That's just a little bit of that. There's pages of this stuff, guys. They behead people. They kidnap people. These are brutes, right? Intent. Since the end of the 2006 war with Israel, Hezbollah has continued to issue public threats against Israel. In 2009 and 2010, Nasrallah threatened that in the next conflict of Israel, if Israel bombed Hezbollah's stronghold in southern Beirut, the group would bomb Tel Aviv. And you hit Rafiq al-Hariri's International Airport in Beirut, we will hit Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv. And yeah, airport safe. So, you know, we've just had a bit of so-called terrorism out at the airport, haven't we? We had live guns wrestled to the ground and hurt by these brutes. I say these because I think these people are the same lot that we've got in this country at the moment. Links with Iran and Syria. This is paragraph 37. Iran and Syria support Hezbollah as wide-ranging, historical, and filters throughout the organisation. The jurist-theologian Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini provides the highest level of clerical guidance to the organisation leaders, the ideology and objectives. The IRGC envoys are also reportedly present at the command level within IR. The two countries provide national assistance in the form of money, political support, military training, and military hardware. Go back and have a look at the ideology. Why do they do this stuff? It's religious. They believe that they have the right to do a jihad against the rest of the world, the non-believers. That includes us, guys. That includes us. Anybody. It doesn't matter what race you are. Islam is not a race. The people who have an idea about Islam being a race and talk about being racist to talk about them are in the set with, what's her name? Hannah. What's her name, Hannah? The stupid woman who thought that everybody who had long hair and plaits might have been, or plaited their daughter's hair, might have been a terrorist, etc. Okay. So, anyway, you can read them for yourself. I mean, I could be here all night reading them, but that was one that I did, which was the first statement of case. As I say, they get renewed every three years. So this one here was the statement of case to renew the designation of Hezbollah. This was 2021 or 22, not sure which one. Okay. This paper sets out the updated information about IR's continued involvement in terrorist activity and covers any relevant changes or developments to the organisation since its original designation in October 2010 and renewal in October 2013, September 2016, and September 2019, including IR's objective, structure, weapons, and tactics. So three years after 2019 must have been 2022. All right. Who was the Prime Minister who signed these off? Jacinda Ardern. It includes recent attacks, which meet the definition of a terrorist attack under the TSA. The statutory criteria, etc., gives you the legal part of that, which is section 35.1 of the Suppression of Terrorism Act 2002, the New Zealand Act. The Prime Minister may renew the designation for a further three years under section 35.2 if satisfied that there are still reasonable grounds, as set out in section 22, for the entity to be designated under that section. Okay. Credibility of sources. The paper has been prepared using open and unclassified sources, which have a reputation for careful and unbiased reporting. These include Reuters, the Washington Post, and Al Jazeera. A range of think tanks were referred to, including Council on Foreign Relations, Anti-Defamation League, Centre for International Security and Cooperation, Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, Missile Threats, and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Yet, here we are, all these people who, you know, talk about conspiracy theorists, right? They know all about this. They know all about it. Evidence to support designation renewal. On the 6th of August 2021, the IR were responsible for firing 19 rockets towards Israel, with three falling short in Lebanon. Of the remainder, 10 were intercepted by Israel's air defense system and six landed in open countryside near the towns of blah, blah, blah, blah. Okay. This attack indicated an escalation from the militant group, raising concerns that exchanges will spill over into open conflicts. Further, in August 2021, it was reported that IR's weapons arsenal comprised predominantly of small and unguided surface-to-surface artillery rockets and that supply has expanded to an estimated 130,000 rockets. Do you remember when, do you remember just a few months ago, maybe a year ago, when the Americans got out of, um, got out of Afghanistan and left all their weaponry there? Yeah. And we were letting these people from Afghanistan into our country for some reason, unvaccinated. Obviously, we want them here. Ideology and objective. IR is the military wing of Hezbollah and shares the ideology of its present parent organization. IR embodies the core purpose of Hezbollah, which is to eliminate the state of Israel and the establishment of Islamic rule over Jerusalem. Hezbollah opposes Israel and Western powers operating in the Middle East. It is IR, as the military wing of Hezbollah, which continues to engage in terrorist activity, including the rocket attacks described above. IR consists of two main branches, enforcement and recruitment and combat, which both hold, which both hold objectives of reinforcing the group's belief in Wiliyat al-Faya. This doctrine forms the basis for contemporary Shia political thought, which advocates for all political and religious authority to be transferred to the Shia clergy and the rest of the Islamic world. Religious command to fight the party's enemies. Here's an interesting little fact for you guys. Both mosques in Christchurch are Sunni. They're not Shia. Organization and structure. Okay, that's the structure of it. And then they've got all of the things. So they don't have too many, they've got a half a page of small things you can go to and look at them. The original one has got pages and pages of, you just could spend your whole time studying this guys. What I'm saying to you is I believe we have a terrorist situation on our hands in New Zealand and the way that our army and our police force especially have been forced into these jabs is very, very disturbing. Very, very disturbing indeed. I only came about because, you know, I mean, I only found out because I was looking for something for Section 191 to see if there was any designated people who were able to do what Bloomfield said he was able. Well, he implied it, let's say. He implied it by putting his name to exemption, right? I'm not just talking about the medical ones. I'm talking about the operational ones too. And all of the operational ones were supposed to be... I'll have a look and see if I've got that up on my screen. If I can share it with you. Actually, I might be able to share it with you easily. I've got it all to myself tonight. Let's see if I can do it. Share screen. Which one? No, it doesn't seem to be there. Okay, but you've heard me talk plenty of times about Clause 9 of the main order. If you want to have a look at it yourself, go to the COVID-19 public health response, response, vaccinations in brackets, order 2021, and you go back in the version. Okay, so the third tab along, I'm going towards the right. There's versions. Go to that and go to the older versions and you'll be able to see those because they've all been revoked now. Pretty much a whole lot of them have been revoked. So you won't actually see what was there in the original. There was another little... I've been pushing this. Try and wake some people up. The doctors. Try and wake the doctors up to the fact that, in fact, now is the time to stand up and say, what were you doing? We never had any authority. We didn't have any authority to vacc. The CEOs had no authority to... The CEOs and the head of police, commissioner of police, the person on the, what's his name, cluster, and then also short, the chief of the defence force, both at all points to the fact we are in a state of emergency because they've got hold of our, they've weakened our defences so much, but I believe if people can get this out there to people, make them understand what we're talking about, then there's a lot more chance that the ones who are left and the ones who, even if they've been jabbed and they're sick, they will come to our, they'll come to the party and they'll get rid of these, they'll get rid of these top people. I think, Nikolai, I think that they are, they don't want to listen because they don't see any hope. They don't see any way through. They don't see what next, right? I think the police need to be approached with the evidence that we've got and I thought we could start with the fact that nobody, people who were jabbed, right, people who were jabbed and are sick with it, they need to be going down to the police with Regulation 44A out of the Medicine Act and saying, I don't believe, I want you to investigate this person who jabbed me because I don't believe that they had any authority to do so, right? Good on you, Nikolai. Okay, things are going very well on the, in terms of the cases that we're taking through the authority in the court. Here again, the lawyers are trying to stop it before they get to the authority, which means that sometimes we're just settling it for, you know, people. You know, that's their choice, you know, if they get offered enough money. This is not going to happen for the people with the, who've been jabbed and jibbed, of course. But that is not, although we've been advising the jabbed and jibbed on all sorts of things to do, we won't be taking those cases. But I can now tell you that we have made an alliance with the, with the Project PAL, which is C-A-L, which stands for Class Action Lawsuit. Some of you might have heard, Amanda. Yeah, sorry, I'll finish what I was going to say about Project PAL. They're getting a trust together that people won't have to pay for their representation. We've got plenty of people that we pretty much have got the case together for them. And, yeah, good on you, Jeff. So we've basically got to join up together. They're not, you know, I mean, they're going to do their stuff, we're going to do ours. We're sticking with the employment courts and the employment authority. There's going to be group actions on all sorts of matters. One of their first ones was to get some, some, you know, some, you know, justice for the, for the jabbed. So this will be, this will be one of the first things that we will assist with. But they have, you know, the bullying, sorry, not the bullying, the assaults on the population down at the, down at the Freedom Village, or many, many, many, many things that show that we're in a fascist state, basically. And they'll be taken, they're called representative actions in New Zealand. They're not called class actions. Class actions is the American term, but it's pretty much the same sort of, sort of pathway in New Zealand. The, so, so we're going to help them with that. So we're, we're looking, we're looking for, for lawyers. I've said to them, I don't think you should pay lawyers very much. Okay, pay them enough to cover their, cover the cost of their materials, pretty much, right? Because we don't want any of these lawyers who are, who are in it for the money. Right? We want the lawyers like we've got in this union. But none of us have got, none of us have got our licences, and I don't intend to get mine back. Thank you. Not having a law society. Oh, that's right. I saw a, I saw a, I had a post from the Free Speech Union. Yeah, what's the Free Speech Union? Just today. And said, and it said that the Law Society was one of the groups who were wanting hate speech legislation. Can you imagine that? That is terrible. Yep. Yeah, yeah, you're right, Gina, they get paid win or lose. Yeah, they can get paid. That's, that's fine. But we want the ones who, you know, have, have a bit of integrity. Right? In the end, even if we have to do it, we have to McKenzie-friend everybody and be in court with them and just have it all written down and tell them what to say. We're going to do it. Right? So, great groups of people at Project Hell, and things are coming together. So, pretty much, we've got the employment side all shown up. And now, the other, the other matters we can, we can go after. And of course, there's no reason to, but I think the police need to get on board. They need to know that they've been, that Costa never had any authority to do what he did. Okay? So, any policemen you know, tell them, especially the jab ones. Yeah, go ahead. I just wanted to mention one thing when you were talking about the jabbers. I spoke to my doctor and I said, how would you go on if somebody came after you wanting to claim on your professional indemnity, medical malpractice insurance for what you might have done? And he said, oh, I have to help them. Now, that was interesting. So, if we start, or those who have suffered at the hands of jabbers, start getting in touch with those who did the jabbing and tell them that they're coming after them, it might motivate them to get in touch with their insurers. And then we would be really off and running. Yep. What was the other thing? You need to, you need to get anybody injured who wants to do that. They need to. What they have to do is go to the jabber because they cannot claim directly against the insurer. Jabbed are not insured. It's the jabber that's insured. Yeah, that's correct. But remember, guys, go to the police as well. Go to the, no, Jeff, the police will be following this up, I assure you. Right? Because a lot of them have been jabbed as well. And they've been, they've been sort of sitting on the sidelines thinking, how the hell can we get this? Now, if they, if you go to them with Regulation 44A out of the Medicines Act and say, and go to the police and say, I don't believe that the person who jabbed me had this authorisation. I want you to investigate it. Okay. The first thing you do, you go after that, you go and tell the doctor if you've got one that jabbed you. Some people got jabbed by the, at the jabathons or whatever they were called. Right? Make sure that you know who it was. Even if you didn't get injured, guys, go after them. Yeah. Okay, Michael. Hey, through my context, I've been told that the, the police that didn't take the jab have been treated very poorly by those that did, which is the majority of the police. So you may be over hopeful about how the police are going to react to you unless you strike the right person. Yeah, well, we need the police, that we need, if they're being treated badly, it means they're still in the job. Okay. So if you can find out who those are that are still in the, in the job, we need to talk to them. Right. Okay. And you, and you think we're currently still at a state of war, or we are at a state of war? I believe we are. Have you, have you, have you heard of the Naval Prizes Act? It's, it's real old law. It's about 18 something or other. Yeah, I have, yeah. But under a state of, a state of war, the police basically become bounty hunters. It's worth a read. The Policing Act is extremely interesting too. The Policing Act 2008. If they're, if they're working in a, but they can still be held responsible even if they're, you can have people who are non-sworn members working for the UN, right? Yeah. In another country. But you know what? I believe, because of the treason document, they, there's certain people think that this is another country called Aotearoa. Yeah. That they've actually administratively taken over. And that what, and that they think that they are going to be able to say, oh yeah, we're, you know, that we were, we were doing what we were in, we are entitled to do. The, it's interesting too. If you have a look on, it's the, if you, if you look in secondary legislation, there's a, there's a whole, there's a whole part of secondary legislation that explains it all. Basically these notifications serve to authorise people to do things. Okay. So what we can say is that in actual fact, there was no authorisation given for all of the, all of that went on. Oh, empowered, sorry. Sorry. I made a little note about secondary legislation. It's about empowering people. So each empowering provision has a publication note below it that sets out how the secondary legislation must be published. Now, as you remember, I talked about section 191 and subsection 4, which tells you how that empowering legislation must be published. And it must be published in the Gazette. We know about that. The other thing is that there was a word went out to certain people who should know better today about the fact that it, that it looked like it was, it looked like it was for a start that the doctors had no right to be jabbing, but also on the, on the basis of what 191 talked about. This person came back with the, this is a person as a lawyer and came back, well, with secondhand, the person who came back said, oh, it's okay. This lawyer has got it all in hand and it was done by order and counsel. Right? So, of course, I looked up order and counsel. So what are orders and counsel? They're basically pieces of legislation, secondary legislation, because orders and regulations are both secondary legislation. And those orders and counsel have to be Gazetted as well. So there are 12 orders and counsel that that are available for us to look at. The last one that was, was done in 2017. And this is interesting for the people who, you know, talk about roads, roads is a nautical term, that you're in the roads, right? When you're in a shipping lane, it's called a road. The 12 orders and counsel signed off by various Governor General. The last, the most recent one was 2017, signed off by Honourable Dame Patsy Reddy. And she was a declaration of a motorway in Auckland. The Michael Webster was Clerk of the Executive Council. So he's the one that, you know, she makes the order and he, he, he publishes it and signs it for that way. The one before that was in 2015. So they're pretty rare. Lieutenant General Sir Jerry Mataparae, on the 24th day of August 2015, there was another roading declaration, the Tauranga Eastern Link. On the 3rd of March 2011, Anand Satyajan was the Governor General and it was a declaration of a motorway near Orewa. The interesting thing about the Satyajan one is that the Clerk at that stage was Rebecca Kitteridge, the Clerk of the Executive Council. Now, do any of you remember who Rebecca Kitteridge is? She's Head of the Security Service. She's the woman with the curl in the middle of her forehead. Right? Yep. Okay. So all of the, and this is why it was so important that they got the communications and transportation and ports, et cetera, under their control. This is why all of these orders were specific, not just the nurses and the teachers. Well, we know why the teachers, but they need them under control so they can do the propaganda. The medicals so that they could jab everybody and drug them. But the other ones, of course, were the boarders and the ports and the, yeah. Jeff, you've been told before to put your phone, if you're going to have a sleep or an eat, put your thing off. Okay. Thanks, Jeff. Was putting the boarders. Yeah. So basically strategic. This is all the stuff. I'm reading you about Hizballah, right? I'm reading you about what these terrorist organisations do. They take a leaf out of each other's book. Our government is a terrorist organisation. That is going to be one of the charges that they're going to face under the Terrorist Suppression of Terrorism Act. They're going to be charged with terrorism. Now, why does the SIS not, you know, who puts these reports together and publishes them on the police website and then takes them before each prime minister to be signed off? Why have they not been making a noise about these? Because this is just one group. If you go to that police website, you'll be able to read about all sorts of groups. They're mostly Islamic. Mostly Islamic. There's a couple of them from the Balkans, of course, very near the Ukraine. There's one IRA and then, of course, there's the Australian parent. My personal view is that parent was actually recruited to do that, not by any white supremacist, because there's nothing to do with the colour of your skin and all of that. Terrorists are terrorists. It was to do with political and ideological reasons. Yeah, he was on the same side of one of those, as I said before, those mosques were, they were coaching people in the ideology of jihad. A few of those guys who were down, you know, going to the mosques in Christchurch went on to join the forces in the Middle East to try and rid the world of Jews, as they see as their main thing. But, you know, Christians are pretty much up there on the list as well, and anybody, any Westerner basically. You can see in the reports that they were bombing the Russian embassy, they were bombing the Israeli embassy, they were bombing the American embassy, whatever, whatever. Anyone who was infidel in their view, right, they'll go up. The, what is it called, the Sikh religion was formed basically as a military response to the, to the caliph that was descending on, and the, and the hordes of warlords, etc, that were descending on North India. That's where their religion comes out. So, you know, apart from them, and it looks like they might fight amongst themselves as well, the different sects as well. So, it's been a very different, very different evening this evening. But, you know, we're going, and it's early days, there'll be more and more things that come out of this, but I think it's important that people understand, I always said this was more than a union, this was a movement, and now's the time to get the wicked ones on the run. And I think that more and more, I think we do, each do our little bit, the better. Okay, anybody, our leadership, it's a very similar situation from as Mexico, Mexico government being infiltrated by the cartel. Yeah, yeah, I mean, these, these cults, their gangs, they're the wicked, they're the wicked. And they're a small part of everybody's society, actually, but now they ever affect us. Because the really smart ones get into positions of power because they had no conscience whatsoever. What they see as, as in their interest, they will go after, and, you know, their interest is to have everybody under their power. So, they have no, just basic conversations apart from Christianity. Okay, so, I don't know, guys, um, anybody got some stories? Got some suggestions? What are you going to do? Get tricks up? Oh, might be an interview coming up soon. Um, we, I'm still, I'm still negotiating that with somebody. So, that might be a little bit wider, this talk, then. Yeah, Lynette, go ahead. Hi, Liz. Hiya. Just wondering, I'm going back to my niece with this employee, which I spoke to you about. She handed my niece's daughter, two weeks ago, the latest document from ACC, which said she was unfit to work until the 23rd of March, which is coming up shortly. So, with this, does, is Janine actually, does she have to employ her that, even though she's been gone from the business for a year, and this is not the first time she's done this? No, she doesn't. So, how's she going to get around that legally? Because she's pretty cunning. No, well, that ACC note, it could be for any employer. Who the hell, it's her problem. She get employed by somebody else, Lyn. So, she, because Janine's a bit worried that she's going to get into trouble, because these two, husband and wife, are pretty, pretty good at, you know, um, being in the system. Oh, yes. So, she'll have to get herself a, she'll have to get herself a, the woman who's wanting, you know, who's, who's basic. Oh, well, she said, she said to me... She's probably been, she's probably been before the authority a few times. They, they go back and back, and the authority gets, gets smart to it after a while. Well, that's good, because she actually passed this on to, uh, Janine's daughter and said, I'll get your mother to ring me. And Janine told me that. I was like, gee, well, whatever you get your mother to ring me. She said, well, maybe I can just put her on light duties and get her to do... Why should she? Yeah, I think she's a little bit worried that... Oh, did she make the claim, because something had happened to her at work? Well, she said that she had, um, tripped in the office, but none of the other staff members had seen her. Yeah, but why did the, the doctor who gave her the, who put her in the first place, what did she tell the doctor? Well, I'd hate to think what she told the doctor, but these doctors up here are... Yeah, but if she, here's the thing, Lynette. If she told the doctor she did it at work, then there would have been notification to work. Okay? So she didn't tell the doctor that, so it's like there's nothing to do with, with your, with your knee. Okay? Yeah, well, that's what I try and say too, that... Yeah, well, I can't say any more than that, Lynette. Yeah, well, Janine has now joined, and she did, she did, um, put a question in to when she joined up. She put the question in and asked, um, I don't know, when she had on her thing, she asked that question to you guys, and this is like, and then I joined her up like two weeks ago, so... Right. So she's still... Did it go over to info, did it? Yeah, it went into that and they accepted it. Well, I'll only answer, I'll only answer it the same way as I'm answering it now. Yeah. She didn't do it at work. But she said she couldn't... Yeah, well, she might say that, but she didn't say that to the doctor, because if she said it to the doctor, work would have, then the business would have got notification from ACC. I think they did. I think they did. I mean, the letters down in the office, and it's like, I looked at the other day, and it's just, and this has been a whole year, but she's, previous to that, she was also probably on the same ACC thing about two times a year, and one of the staff said, oh, God, look out, she's looking to get winter off. I mean, that's... Yeah. Yeah, but, you know, this is the thing. Well, you know, she says she didn't work. Who's, where's the proof? Well, none of the other staff members saw it, because she did it in the office. Well, you know, I mean, the thing is that Janine should, you know... Just say no, there's no job for you, because she had to find other staff for the last year to cover her position. Yeah, and why should those people be... Yeah. ...put out? No. Exactly. Okay, well, I'll pass that on to her. Yeah. I mean, it's not as if it's an occupational... You know, an occupational injury that, you know, missing heavy things or something like that. It would have been, yeah, well, I don't know what, you know, I've got so little information, Lynette. Yeah. I can't really give a decent... And I did note on this medical certificate that it said she twisted at work, and that's where she hurt it, but then she says she fell over in the office area, at the cup of tea area. Oh. Oh, I tell you. Anyway, I need to chase Janine up about that, because we're coming up to the 23rd, and if I know Janine being the kind-hearted thing she is, she'll let the evil woman back. But... Yeah, well, it's up to her. It's up to her. She doesn't have to, right? The union's not going to be involved in arguing about it. Yeah, yeah. I understand that. But anyway, just as long as I know that she doesn't have to employ... You know, I mean, if she then makes a complaint to the authority, we'll hear about it, and then... Then we can do something about it, because we'd have more... We'd have information. Yeah, well, they'd make the complaint to... I mean, I've been through it myself with an employee which I never even employed, but she sued me because... Oh, long story. But anyway, it cost me $3,000, and this was to this court in Christchurch. Oh, this was like 10 years ago. But this woman had me... Well, what? To the employment authority? This woman that... No, but who did she make the complaint to? What are they called? Oh, you know... Small claims. The small claims with employee, and you basically had... No, no, no, no, no. All employment matters go to the authority. Is this like 15 years ago, or has that law changed? No, it's still the same. If it was anything to do with employment, it's got to go through the authority. I sat in this stupid court in Christchurch, and ended up walking out, and that's 15 years ago. $3,000 was a lot of money, and I'm thinking, oh, my God. But it was a court. Are you sure? Wasn't like you go to the court to, you know, if you're DIC, what is it? Was this particular... The authority. Yeah, and like... Well, you know, if anything like that happens, if they get notice of a statement of problem, okay? Yeah, okay, cool. All right. Okay, cool. What's in flames? Somebody said in flames is starting here now. What's that mean? Somebody... Oh, hang on. I need to go up the... The chemical truck supposedly has gone up in flames on the motorway. That was the thing put in the chat. What went up in flames? A chemical tanker. Oh, okay. I was just trying to do a copy and paste, see if I could find anything, but that's okay. It was on the Auckland Bridge. What? On the Hammer Bridge? Yeah. Wow. The fly spray cans, apparently. Fly spray cans? Apparently. Darn. I hope there's not a shortage of that. Sorry, what was it? Fly spray cans. They do explode, you know. Papakura, 3.30am. Well, that's not the Auckland... No, it was on the Harbour Bridge. I mean, not that I watched the Muppet Show, but I was in the kitchen and I was running around with tea and I said it was in the Auckland Harbour Bridge and I saw the Auckland Harbour Bridge and all these people saying, oh, yeah, I heard all this noise. I mean, I wasn't even listening, but anyway. Well, somebody else said Papakura, 3.30am. That's the Auckland Harbour Bridge. Oh, I better ask Faye Marie. Nikolai, I don't know what Geoff is eating. I don't think he's eating anything. It was chocolate cake and ice cream. I have put it on one side so that I can make a final contribution before you all go, which is the sacrifice I have made to participate in this debate. Go on. I just wanted to say we are moving on to various things and I just wonder if perhaps we should go back to Starve the Beast, because it's all about the money when it all boils down to it. You stop them getting the money and you shut them down in a heartbeat. And that is one of the things... Well, people are doing that, Geoff, but we're not having it on this one because we have bank accounts, OK? We're not discussing it on this one. And that's the reason why. OK. The other thing I just wanted to mention, somebody put a post on our... Tons of people go on to Starve the Beast and if they want to run their own Zoom, they can do it and you can help them set it up. OK. No more. The other thing was, I just wanted to mention that somebody put a post on our Facebook page relative to the election pushing this one party. And it's a bit relevant, but not totally. But I went and had a look at the policies and particularly the economic policy, as you can imagine. Hey, by the way, sorry to interrupt, but if it's on our page, it should be removed because we're not party political, right? OK, well, it was posted and I think it might be still there. Anyway, their economic policy is they're going to be invested in this and invested in that, increasing the minimum wage and all this stuff. But they don't see where the money's coming from. So I wrote to them, but they never bothered to reply. So I think that's a good reason as well to remove the post from the page. We do not want. I hate politicians with a vengeance now. Yeah, me too. After what they've done. I agree with you 100 percent. Anyway, that's me done. Thank you. I won't eat cake and ice cream in public again. Cheers, Jeff. There's Papakura stuff, updates. Explosion like a bomb blast, ash covers houses and truck goes up in flames on motorway. OK, let's have a look and see what it says. So it wasn't on a, it might be one of the bridges over the motorway, you know. That's probably where the, where the, I can't seem to look at it. Yeah, Papakura at 3am sounds quite probable because that's when a lot of those trucks are supposed to be moving about because, you know, they are dangerous. And, you know, the fewer people that are on the motorways when they're moving around. Oh, dear. Oh, well, it might kill the mosquitoes. I hope nobody will see it. OK, guys, we'll say goodnight and I guess we'll stop the recording.