black friday sale

Big christmas sale

Premium Access 35% OFF

Home Page
cover of wigan
wigan

wigan

Ruairi Mags

0 followers

00:00-35:53

Nothing to say, yet

Podcastspeechgaspinsidesmall roomnarration

Audio hosting, extended storage and much more

AI Mastering

Transcription

The hosts of the Irish Boys Podcast discuss the prestige of the FA Cup and whether it has lost its sparkle. They reminisce about how big the FA Cup was in the past and how it was a big deal to watch it on TV. They also talk about Manchester United's strategy for the game against Wigan and the importance of winning the FA Cup for the team and the manager's future. They debate if it's the manager's or the players' fault if the team performs poorly. They predict a 3-1 win for Manchester United, but express concern about the team's inconsistency. At halftime, they discuss the missed opportunities and blame the wastefulness of certain players, particularly Erling Haaland. They also question the partnership between Haaland and Scott McTominay. Oh, it's a craic. Welcome to the Irish Boys Podcast for a year and a half to watch Manchester United play Wigan in the FA Cup, the prestigious trophy that it is. I'm here with Mum, here with Ciarán. How are we going? All good. Full of positivity. Yeah, there's a question still on my mind. Do you think the FA Cup has lost some of its sparkle or is it still as prestigious as it was? For me, it's still as prestigious. I think it's still a big cup. Yeah, to me it's still something to shame. And if it was back, I would say maybe 20, 30 years ago, Mum, the FA Cup was massive, wasn't it? Oh, it was huge, yeah. You didn't get all the live matches that you get now. Yeah, yeah. So the FA Cup would have been shown on BBC, I think. BBC and ITV. So it was a big, big deal. Everyone got to see it. Yeah, basically. It was massive last year, because obviously United made the final, but I don't get the buzz coming into the FA Cup. It kind of feels like a free hit at the minute. You know when you go into a Champions League game and you kind of feel that butterflies in your stomach? You're like, oh, I really want to win this one. I don't get that with the FA Cup, man. You get that here, do you? It depends on who we're playing and how well we are playing. To be honest, I think if we're playing well, I'm like, oh, we're into the next round, and I hope we're watching the draw on your phone when you're at work and stuff, and you're buzzing to see who you get. It is a big occasion getting to Wembley. The final last year can be buzzing, but on the build-up to it, I don't remember, even when we were coming to the quarter- and semi-finals, being massively buzzed and thinking, God, we can make the finals. You know, it kind of felt like, if we do, we do. If we don't, we don't. Silverware, though. Yeah, it is. Oh, no, I'm not discounting it. I'm just saying as a general feeling. Back in my day, it would have been bigger, I think. Now with the Champions League and football is saturated on TV now, I know where you're coming from, but it's still a big cut for me. Well, this is going to be an interesting one. You're going to play Wigan tonight, and he's going with a full-strength squad. Well, I expected, I said it the other day when you were saying that you were hoping to see the kids, and said, I'd love to see the kids, but I don't think he'll do that. He's cracked Dolly all the way. I don't think so, either. No, he's just gone full-strength. Do you think he's breaking it over his jaw? Do you think that's why he's cracked full-strength? Looking back to last season, I think we watched the two cup runs, and he went full-strength in all of them runs last year as well. Yeah, it doesn't help him. I think he sticks with it. If he has a set of 11, a strong 11, he'll always play that. Now, he might mix the kids in and give them minutes and substitutes and maybe play one or two. So the game's going well. Yeah, yeah, which you can understand, but I think there's kind of an element, like you said yourself, Rory, like this is the last cup maybe he has available to him. So it was either go big or go strong or go home. Yeah. I think it was his last chance to go back to Holland. I'm not going to go totally on the Italian, but I don't see Manchester United getting top four, so I think this is his last chance to eke out a Champions League spot. This cup, I think, could save his Manchester United career at the end of the season if he wants to stick together. I think he'd be horrid as a sack if he's still in with an FA Cup shirt and he's lingering about top four. Unless we mathematically get to the point where it's like, no, you're too far away. It's impossible. Yeah, you're not even going to make the Europa League, is it? No. But, yeah, I don't know. I've seen the team sheet and I was like, what are you saying about that? If you need it to be a fair wicket, then you have to, the whole team should give up on football. Like, there's no chance tonight. No chances. No, I'm going to say there's no chance tonight that Wigan can do it against that Man Utd team. This is going to be like a friendly. Well, hopefully. I think his plan tonight is to tank Wigan in the first half, get the game over and done with, and then roll the bench up. Yeah, you've got to have a point there. Yeah, I think. Tonight, there's an advantage. All of them. I think Liam Shorthair and his Eagles. Shorthair, his Eagles. Campbell is there. Kamala is there. Yeah. But if you get confidence for Rashford, Garnaccio, Hoyland, if they can score a goal, a brace, it'll gain momentum and it'll gain confidence for those fronts because they're not firing at all. No. I suppose that's, yeah, something that's really just like that sort of warm-up game to show what you can do or what the game plan is against Wigan opposition. Maybe to prove that the strength of the Premier League is the problem and the players that he has available for selection. You know, that if we had better players in those moments, this is what we can do and play football. But, look, I feel like talking about this game before, there's not much to say. I have one question for you. Right? As ever the optimist and the queen of Hopian, what if Manchester United put in a draw performance in the first half against Wigan? Is it the manager's fault or is it the players' fault? Like, can we turn around and say... The manager picks the players. And they're first team players that he's picked tonight. Can we dissect him tactically if his game plan is the way to play football against Wigan? Or are we reading too much into it? I think you're reading too much into it. I think there's players in that first team that cannot play his system, cannot implement the style that he wants to implement. That's just my take on it. Do you think the players coming back can? Martin is, definitely. Yeah, he's a centre-back, but he's not going to spring the attack in the midfield. That's where his system starts, from the centre-backs. Yeah, but it eventually has to get in the midfield. I don't know if Kasimir and Mount are going to be good enough to be able to play the way he wants to play. That's Settle stroking the ball across the pitching spot. He needs the midfield, essentially, to come back and drive that forward lane forwards. So, Martin is feeling like giving him a nod and coming back to me. I think Martin is the key player. I think Kasimir was panicked by it. I think Kasimir was panicked by it. Definitely, 100%. I think Kasimir has tried to integrate himself in Derek's and Hag's system this season. And people are saying, oh, Kasimir's lost it. I don't think he has. I don't think he suits the Hag's system at all. Frankly, I'm chasing the ball somewhere. And then the tanks, 4-0. And we panicked and paid £60 million for Kasimir. And then he got a hold of the midfielder. But it'll be interesting to see what he's back to doing. I keep dragging it back. We've seen Mount and Kasimir this season. They didn't knock him. So, what's your score prediction tonight, then? 3-1. You think Wigan will score? Against a full-strength United team? I do. I don't know how you can say that with a serious face. One word. It's very, very true. There's always a chance he'll get it. You may be 4-0. You have to be 4-0. I guarantee you, Wigan will score first. We'll go full under pressure and we'll come out and play as the top of football. And we're on with the cost and we'll have to go for it. 3-1 against this bad guy. Well, they've let me down so many times this season. I think they're guaranteed to go behind. Look at Liverpool. Games have gone down 2-0 to a lesser team on paper, as you say. You know, we've sat buzzing about a few games coming here. And then watched it in half-way through. After a brilliant performance. I think I said to you this. Being a United fan was like Dominion. The fans were cheering. They were loving themselves. And then, next game, beat 2-0 or 3-0 by Brantford. You know, it's up and down. You can't get excited for... Inconsistency. I said, OK, this has to be positive. They'll go 4-0. 4-0 United. They should beat Wigan 4-0. They should. Wigan's a League 1 team. Stronger than League 1. They should 4-0 by any Premier League team. Well, I'm hoping now. My big hope is... After Haaland, unfortunately, being ill in the last game. After getting his first goal. That he kicks on and... Yeah, that's a big hope. Gets a couple of goals today against Wigan, which he should. Well, we'll be back at half-time. Let's just go and enjoy the first half. Hopefully. Hopefully. And it's half-time! United are winning! Yay! Yay! Woo! What do you think of that first half? Give me an honest impression. I don't think we should be out of sight. That first half with the amount of chances was created. And the amount of chances that wasn't taken. Again. Who do you blame? I tell you who I blame. Haaland. I finally have come to the realization... Rosmus Haaland is holding the forward line back. He's very wasteful. Either him... He occupies the same space as Scott McTominay... Scott McTominay shouldn't be occupying his space. Has McTominay more chance of scoring than Haaland there? No. I don't think so. Then how has he scored more than him? Just luck. Do you know what I mean? I know you're saying logic with the game. But... Scott and I are better finishers in the middle of the night. Scott McTominay is occupying the striker's position and he shouldn't be doing that. That's tactics. Tactics? That's what he's on the pitch to do. We've seen that from the start of the season. If Scott McTominay plays, Scott McTominay has a clear directive from our manager. And that is to play as an advanced player and arrive late into the box. So if the manager can't see that, what hope do the rest of us have? Obviously there's no partnership between Scott McTominay and Rosalind Haaland. No, I don't think... Nobody should be calling for that. I don't think there's a partnership between Rosalind Haaland and anybody at the minute. He kind of seems a bit isolated. A bit like Lone Ranger-esque up there at the minute. He's trying his hard out to do things. But... I think it comes to a point where trying is just not good enough. It's not good enough. You have to do. And there's the heading opportunity and the one where it just sort of came and bobbled up to him. It bobbled up to him. I could have gave him if he had scored the header. Yeah. And then the other chance was that Kieper made a good save for the other woman. Yeah. Yeah, it was a good save. It was an awkward chance for him too, wasn't it? But we've watched game after game of him not getting any chances. Yeah. Not getting in those positions. Not being... No, he will, I think... It'll click. But he's still a very young player to be voting that line. He is... Manchester United have dropped the ball by only banning Rasmus Huyghlin. Absolutely. And having him as the front foot behind to that attack. I mean, I know we all cry out and say, oh, the 49ers aren't good enough. They're not scoring enough goals. I don't think Rasmus Huyghlin is the boy for this moment. I think that's holding our forward line back. He'll be playing for the future. Yeah. Yeah. He's so wasteful. I've cried out for him not getting enough chances in games. And now I'm watching him get chance after chance against Wigan. Then against Mr Tickle. And he can't score. He's not good enough. He's a cracking young keeper. Yeah. He's been good. He really does. Being an English keeper as well. He is, yeah. £50,000. He's a... £50,000. £60,000 worth, I know. He's hoping to go back to Fulham and take over as their number one. But he's just unknown to Wigan. He's just unknown. Very good. Yeah. Cracking young keeper. But, yeah, I think tonight's showing Huyghlin off something serious, isn't it? I know. He's just missed so many glaring opportunities. So many opportunities he should score. Absolutely, baby. But they all have. Garnaccio's missed some as well. Rashford's brilliant and wasteful. But Rashford and Garnaccio have not missed an open opportunity yet. No, but... What Rashford and Garnaccio have done is individually create chances for themselves and then miss those chances. But they haven't been blatantly obvious like Huyghlin's. So I find it very hard to lay the blame on Garnaccio. And Garnaccio has been brilliant, hasn't he? He's been very good. Very good. I'd love to have any blame. I'm just saying, you know, we can't... They have. They've created themselves. Everybody has. And that's what Huyghlin can't do. Rashford and Garnaccio are able to create these opportunities for themselves as they're taking on players and chinking into positions. Huyghlin can't do that. So he has to be on it. He has to be razor-sharp when the chance falls his way. And when he doesn't do that, he's giving you nothing. It's very hard to justify him up front. Do you know what? With how wasteful he's been, would it be a travesty to throw Huyghlin on? No. To the shagging half? See what he can do? To be up front with Huyghlin in the final. I'd take Huyghlin off. No. I wouldn't. I would. You wouldn't stand to the pulse on the set? No. I think Huyghlin would score in the second half. Do you want to bet on it, Kieran? I said money. Do you think he'd score in the second half? I don't think so. I think he can't have that many clear-cut opportunities after getting a good first goal against Villar. And he has a good side shot with Lee Gould as well. I think, you know, he's bound to take one. Do you know? If you look at any top-class strikers, you're not comparing them to any top, like, you know, the elite, but do you know how many chances strikers do have in a game? Just take them both. Put one away or put two away out of how many? Yeah, I'm just saying, there's no real... If you look at the opportunities, right, and the big glaring misses from Manchester United this season, we've tended to label it the three lads. It's whoever the three lads are playing up front. And now you're watching this, and I'm seeing a striker that is kind of upsetting the whole rhythm of things tonight. Man, you know, it should be out of sight, but the striker's not on it. And it just makes you think, how many other games have we missed this out of hope, you know? Or trying to apply rose-tinted glasses to a new striker because we haven't had one of these. And I'm thinking to myself, how many times have I neglected to say that Rasmus Hoyland is a problem? I don't think he's a problem. I don't think he depends at all on Rasmus Hoyland. Our front line are misfiring. And we've created enough tonight to be out of sight that first half. We've created enough tonight to bring some of those young lads on at halftime, but we can't, because they're just 1-0 up. Yeah, but is there no more of an emphasis on the striker when it comes to not scoring goals? At what point do you fuck all the shit up before you start looking at the wingers and going, you aren't scoring enough? Well, I agree with you to a certain extent, but you can't put it all on Rasmus Hoyland. I'm not saying it's all on him, but he is a problem. In this match, yes, he hasn't scored a goal. One goal on a team, that's not a problem. But how many times have they created chances for Hoyland? Shall we play through the stats there in the Premier League? How many times have the balls been fed to him? Bottom two, three. It's the easiest latter thing. Watch him in the second half. There's a lot of running that Rasmus Hoyland does that is away from his wingers. He looks a very naive striker, in my opinion. Just have a look at it in the second half and tell me how many times Rasmus Hoyland is down and glaring the open and not getting the ball. What I'm seeing is a lad that doesn't present himself right for the ball. He's full of effort and he's full of running, but I don't see a striker that's going to get Manchester United into the top four this season. I really don't. I don't think he can judge it in this game, because he has missed some glaring chances in this game. Yes, but one goal in 15 Premier League games. I understand what you're saying, but we haven't been creating enough chances for him in those Premier League games. We're playing wicked tonight, for God's sake. No, I understand that. There have been chances for them. I tell you what, right? You and I go back and forth all the time. Ciarán, you're in this boat as well. And we say, why is Manchester United going to get top four? And I ask for reasons why they're going to get it. And you just say, oh, I just believe they're going to. Do you think that boy fires Manchester United into the top four this season? I'm saying boy because he's only 20. It's not his duty. I'm not pecking on the lad and saying he's never going to be a brilliant player. I agree with Andy McVeigh. There is a footballer in there and there's a goalscorer in there. Do you honestly think Hyveland scores enough goals in this half of this season to put United top four? Not based on the first 15 games. You can't argue with the one in 15 in the Premier League. He's not clinical enough yet. Exactly, I agree. So what I'm saying is... He's raw. Raw is a good word to use. It's only United now to sign a striker and United aren't getting top four. United should have signed a striker in the summer. That's true. That's the hierarchy of the game. Yes, but tonight has hammered it home for me. That's what I'm saying. This wedding game has hammered it home. Rather than Hyveland not getting you to top four. Not a chance. Hyveland's in your starting line-up more often than not until the end of the year. You aren't getting top four. You're not scoring enough goals. Well the balance of the whole team doesn't look like getting enough to top four. No. No. And that's just plain and simple. But... One of the problems but not the problem. Not the problem. But we're not sitting talking about you know, these players coming back and the Gatwick Mirrors and all the rest. So where's the whole game going now if you're saying we can't get top four with Hyveland? We'll just have to wait. Who's going to score the goals? Cass won't do it. Mount won't do it. Rash doesn't seem to be able to do it this year. He's not going to dig his head out. Aren't they? No, but if you're saying if we're solely pinning our hopes on our young striker getting us top four then no. But that's what I'm saying. What I'm saying is yes, top four is still capable. Oh yeah? Who's your goal scorer? It can't be just one goal scorer. I get that. It looks like everybody's going to get chipped out. Do you look at Man City with Phil Foden? Man City's a very poor example. Because Man City has goals all over the pitch. Look at a lot of the top ten. There's numerous goal scorers. Look at Arsenal. Arsenal being hammered now and the others not having a striker. Yeah, but they were flying before that. So you can't pick and choose. It's an excuse for Arsenal. It's a picture narrative. But Arsenal's goal scorers, this is what I'm saying. Arsenal's goal scorers, right, when they don't have the striker flying is Martinelli and Saka. I can clearly say that. I'm asking you where United's goals are coming from. You're not giving me a straight answer. You're saying to me it could come from anywhere. United's goals are coming from the forward line and it should be coming from the forward line. Yeah, what I'm saying is you're asking me what about Arsenal and I'm saying with Arsenal, you put Saka and Martinelli and that's where I see the goals. You know the card. Yeah. They score goals. I don't see Bruno as a 99th goal scorer. Marcus Rashford's gone off the pile. Anthony's gone off the pile. Can you see the point I'm trying to make? Where are these goals for top four if this boy's not going to get it? United need to spend money, which they don't have in January. So for me it's becoming more and more illogical to turn around and say we'll make top four. Yeah. But we'll see how they get on in this second half against Wigan. I am not expecting the goal effect that I would. I'm going to tentatively say that it's going to be 2-0 or 2-1. I'm sticking with 3-1. You sticking with it? Yeah. Right, we'll talk after the game. All time! You didn't get past Wigan. That's all Manchester United. Yay! That could have been 6 or 7, couldn't it? It should have been. It should have been. Yeah, I know we kind of had a go at Rasmus Feiglund there at halftime, but I don't know, Marcus Rashford was absolutely dire. I'm losing teeth. I've no defence anymore for Marcus Rashford. No, I don't think... How can you go from goals to a half the goal? Like, how can that be? Yeah, but that is the problem with Marcus Rashford. He is so inconsistent. There's something to it. So inconsistent. I think there's a memer. There's something to it with the girlfriend. He breaks up with the girlfriend, he's brawling, and then when they get back together he's on fire. He's a footballer. He doesn't like girlfriends or boyfriends or anybody. I think I am going to admit to Mum's point that Marcus Rashford can only play in a counter-attacking system when he's on the front foot and he's running the defences. I don't think Marcus Rashford is a talented enough player to sit in front of a defender or sit in front of a low block, which he's going to have to as a Manchester United player in the majority of games and perform. It's ragging me how often he gets the ball and takes all the sting out of the play. Yeah. It sucks. And it's just, it's time and time and time again and you're looking at him going you don't know what to be at. No. You don't know what to do. He has the pace. He has no football intelligence up here. He only has pace, Kim. He only has pace. It's okay, he can run it. He can run. When he can't use that pace and he can't terrify defences, he is nothing. In tight space, he's not good enough. When he's playing against a low block, he's not good enough. When he has to try and pass his way through defences, he's not good enough. Marcus Rashford, I don't think he's good enough. He would be good in a counter-attacking team. Counter-attacking football, he'd be good in that system, but he is, and I said it from the start, that he would be not good in possession-based football. He just cannot. And I think the way, Bernard Ten Hag keeps picking him. Yeah, but, do you know who else annoyed me, Nick? Bruno Fernandes. But Bruno Fernandes and Marcus Rashford will not work in possession-based football. They also play their own game, I think. Sometimes you see them three boys just trying to find each other and that's that. Because they're comfortable with that. Yeah. Even when cornered. Yeah. Bruno's whipping the ball deep into the back of the box to try and find Marcus Rashford. There are other players in the team, lads, and they're the two biggest culprits for giving the ball away. You want to play possession-based football where you're trying to pass teams to death and Bruno Fernandes is getting fed up and trying to play the killer pass and failing. Yeah, to me, Bruno Fernandes today is like, I don't know, petulant child at times. He just gets bored. Yeah. It's just damning that we're seeing it against Wigan. You know what I mean? It was blatant against Wigan. It was blatant against Wigan, it was. Yeah, it just stood out against Wigan. And if our manager can see this, and I want him to see it, he has to go. Yeah. But I don't have any faith that he will see this because he hasn't seen it all season. Why would he just start now? Here, one thing that annoys me, I want to get your opinion on this, right, both of you. What was the point in throwing them lads on at the end? No. No point at all. The only thing that I can think of was the game was won and he needed to win that game. No room for failure. No, there was no, definitely no room for failure. And if he had if he had lost against Wigan, oh my God, the pitch force would have been shortened. Yeah, I just think, Andrew Garnaccio to me looked a bit leggy, a bit exhausted coming close to the end of the game. He just waited until the lads had nothing left before he put on palestry. And palestry looks like we janked because I haven't yet to see the lad to not shake his counterpart's hand, not congratulate the player coming off the pitch, but inside he must be thinking what am I doing here? The only thing that I can think of and we're three of us were disappointed he wasn't on earlier is palestry is either going to be sold or out on loan this month. So he's protecting him from injury. And you've seen McManaman during that match. Yeah. He was just going to run around checking people out. Rather than dirty skies back. Yeah. How's this? No bad. No. No, even with a wee skies quiff and all you do, he's going on for it. Yeah, I think I do. I think now that Amit Jalloh has come back. That's the death nail for kind of palestry. I don't think in like, I'm not saying that I see it this way, but I think the way that St. Hag sees it is that palestry is the same level as a Mardy person. Yeah, but do you not think that Amit would always be in the pecking order in front of palestry? I think Amit's a better player than St. Hag. That's what I'm alluding to, yeah. I think palestry is a very hard working grafter and I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think St. Hag is a very hard working grafter. Yeah, I think O'Nanna to me committed no work. I thought we were getting the poor doolaz. The amazing shot stopper failed. But I think he went for O'Nanna because he's a ball playing goalkeeper. And that has worked terrifically. Yes. However, that's why he went for him. David De Gea is a better shot stopper. The way O'Nanna saves shots is the most unorthodox way that I've ever seen in a goalkeeper. It's like playing the old football game You ever dive for the ball? Remember the old SEGA game? SEGA Super Scorers. And when you dive it was the dramatic dive to one side. Like even his one save to me was SEGA Super Scorers. He tried to use his side, his frame. I don't know. But he uses his side and frame in one unilateral movement. So the arms come out at full extension and then he falls on his side. Or goes under. It's the most unorthodox. Agility levels zero. You just wonder is he adhering to the coaching staff and just doing his own thing? Look there are goalkeepers that make a career of having cat-like reflexes and being excellent shot stoppers. There are goalkeepers that make a career of being very very commanding and being able to come out and defend their area. Manuel Neuer perfectly became the sweeper keeper. He almost defined a new generation of goalkeepers. I was led to believe that Andrew O'Nanna defined an even sweeper ball playing goalkeepers. I don't like it. I don't want it. I want to revert back to tights now and get a goalkeeper that can save the ball. I don't think Andrew O'Nanna is going to help us in the back end of the season at all. In fact, I think when you're under pressure he makes that back line. Do you agree? Well it looks like you're right at the moment. Well we don't have a consistent back line either. We don't? No. I think we have 15 different times. 15 different times. The back line has been crazy. Look, he does things where I'm sitting looking going no other goalkeeper would have made that mistake. But I do think you're right in what you're saying. It is very very hard as a goalkeeper to try and get any sort of consistency when you've got so many different people playing in front of you week on week. But, I don't know. Do you think that was a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan? Or is this the squad we expect to see against Spurs? Well, on Man U TV when Eric Tim Hag was interviewed before the match he didn't specify which players were ill or which players were even. We know the players that are injured but they said about the team sheet and he said it's to do with the fact that there's a lot of injuries going on in the team. So, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan. But, I don't know if it's a tactical decision to allow some players to rest and not travel the Wigan.

Listen Next

Other Creators