Whistlin Dixie XXVII

ὦ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐἰ ἐ� and I quote slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power and chattel slavery abolished this I and my European friends are in favor of for slavery is but the owning of labor but it carries with it the care of labor while the European plan led on by England is that capital shall control labor by controlling wages the great debt that capitalist will see to it is made out of the Civil War must be used to control the value of money to accomplish this the government bonds must be used as a banking basis we are now waiting for the Secretary of Treasury of the United States to make this recommendation it will not do to allow greenbacks as they are called to circulate as money for any length of time as we cannot control that but we can control the bonds and through them the bank issues unquote we can discern then from the hazard circuit secretary chase was being manipulated or controlled by the banking cabal there are those on the left and the right to deny the existence of the circular and the cabal's control of chase and by default Lincoln we must ask ourselves did the events as predicted in the circular occur secretary chase then proposed and supported the National Banking Acts of 1863 and 64 now does this go back to the hazard circular and I quote government bonds must be used as a banking basis we are now waiting for the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States to make this recommendation ok so we've got one leg of the stool right secretary chase realizing the necessity of collecting taxes in order to continue the war of aggression on the people in the property of the north and the south black and white also created folks imagine this the Bureau of Internal Revenue and what we commonly refer to today as the IRS chase was very very ambitious and he actually even challenged Lincoln for the presidency in 1864 and he eventually ran for president again in 1868 in 1872 while being the sitting Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court chase would use his position on the Supreme Court to further the interest of the banking cabal especially in a decision called Texas be white chase as the Chief Justice also presided over the impeachment trial of President Andrew Johnson whom the radical Marxist Republicans and who supported Reconstruction scheme to impeach in part because Johnson called the Reconstruction Act of 1867 and I quote a bill of attainder against 9 million people absolute despotism such a power has not been wielded by any monarch in England in 500 years unquote in Texas be white Samuel P. Chase completed the destruction of the mystical Constitutional Republic as is allegedly established in 1788 he obliterated the ninth and tenth amendments of 1791 and he also obliterated the consent of the governed clause of the Declaration of Independence chase converted the free and independent states of the Articles of Confederation to the highly centralized and controlled government we have today of course much of that was done also with the Constitution in 1787 but for many decades students in accredited law schools have been taught that the Constitution means whatever the Supreme Court says it does as if there was no meaning in mind when those written words and phrases were actually constructed that these meanings were founded on natural law were thoroughly explained in the ratification conventions and shouldn't be subject to judicial interpretation but you have to remember that the Federalists were there to lie they were trying to sell something people didn't want but they had to tell them that it was something different to get them to buy it well the trouble is many of the politicians running for office today and all too many ordinary citizens somehow believe these clowns and black gowns to have some kind of wisdom as to the history of this country which none of them actually possess therefore whenever the question of nullification or secession is brought up the almost immediate referral is to Texas be white it is imperative one knows that when Texas be white was litigated Texas was living under martial law and had no representation among the people and did not have free elections it was reconstruction folks there was a motion made during the legal proceedings to dismiss this case on the basis that Texas was not a state at the time of the proceedings but was in fact a conquered territory under military occupation which it was but of course to suit his banking cartel handlers and forever taint what we refer to as stare decisis or stare decisis legal precedent chase denied the motion and stated that despite Texas being prostrated under complete military ruling control she was still a state against all intentions of the people that we know who stood for freedom back in 1775 chase claimed that we are in an indestructible union of indestructible states unquote to ensure that the interest is paid on their fraudulent loans and bonds to our central government the banking cabal cannot allow any state to relieve themselves of the obligation to pay by simply opting out of the violated contract therefore chase stepped up to the plate for the international banking cabal and rendered the desired decision in return chases likeness was placed on the ten thousand dollar bill and his name is forever memorialized by one of the most powerful financial institutions in the Federal Reserve District on Wall Street here's a quote for you they the Radical Republicans in Congress insisted that the existing governments of the southern states be abolished also to the Radical Republicans the defeated southern states offered a unique opportunity for a large-scale social experiment they viewed the population of the South as simply a human chessboard they still do folks you look around you see that that's the same thing we are just players on a stage or players on a game board central planners in Washington could micromanage the region and federal troops would enforce compliance with their dictates it was an absolute bureaucrats dream come true folks how's that different from today don't we have federal agencies and militarized law enforcement radical reconstruction laws which were passed over president Johnson's vetoes consolidated the ten excluded southern states into five military districts the responsibility for most civic functions including elections was removed from local communities and assumed by military governors these governors were appointed by the federal government and given unheard of powers registered voters suspected of having aided or perhaps abetted the Confederate war effort were removed from any voting list at the discretion of the appointed governor of that province he could also add voters to the list if he believed that they had been incorrectly omitted entrances to polling places were controlled by federal troops when voting was complete ballots were sealed and transported to military headquarters to be counted next the ballot tally had to be certified behind closed doors by the military governor and his appointees known as a returning board who would determine the intent of the voters needless to say the radical Republican ticket won every election ever held in the occupied southern states now folks some of that came from the writings of Mr. Gail Jarvis titled evil Republicans I suggest you read that if you get the chance or if you want to is the unconstitutional view that might makes right and we are slaves to a large central totalitarian government without the right to peacefully remove ourselves from this tyranny and oppression common today well of course it is just listen to the people who say that the law is whatever the Supreme Court says it is and if that fails to convince you read the words of one of the former members of the Supreme Court the wonderful far right-wing conservative Antonin Scalia but when asked by a playwright if a state could legally secede Justice Scalia replied and I quote I am afraid I cannot be of much help with your problem principally because I cannot imagine that such a question could ever reach the Supreme Court to begin with the answer is clear if there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War it is that there is no right to secede hence in the Pledge of Allegiance one nation indivisible secondly I find it difficult to envision who the parties to this lawsuit might be is the state suing the United States for a declaratory judgment but the United States cannot be sued without its consent and it has not nor never will consent to this sort of a lawsuit unquote so there you are folks the great Supreme Court justice who said that constitutional issues will be settled by violence and force he said it if there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War it is that there is no right to secede you're a slave this is what you have you have no other choice but there in one fell swoop justice Scalia claimed that the war or guns and bullets settled a constitutional issue didn't mention the Articles of Confederation the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution but he did reference the Pledge of Allegiance a piece of national socialist drivel of which Stalin would be so very proud written by a socialist minister who preached Jesus the Socialist from the pulpit and was a founding member of Boston's first nationalist club communist the pledge a ritual chant in support of government that compels one to ask is such a pledge appropriate for a free people since the banking cartel controls our government are we chanting allegiance to the international banking cartel do our does our military march off to war for the international banking cartel do cops when they enforce unconstitutional illegal laws are they supporting the international banking cartel would a free and independent people in this country not be much better served pledging allegiance to the rights of the people we labor today under a tyrannical de facto government that is diametrically opposed to the government that the Sons of Liberty believe that they were helping to create and that the delegates to the state ratification conventions thought that they were agreeing to our government is the evil spawn of the bankers and their bought and paid for splendid dupes in the White House Congress courts and unconstitutional bureaucracies that Patrick Henry referred to as federal and state sheriff's especially the federal part this government under the guise of preserving the Union and freeing an oppressed people has made slaves of us all trying to think of the Jeffrey Rogers humbles book emancipating slaves enslaving free men another great book if you have the chance to read none of this folks will ever be remedied at the ballot box by voting for income pardon me by voting for incumbents or those endorsed by the leadership of either the donkeys or the elephants war is peace freedom is slavery ignorance is strength I believe that that is a quote directly from mr. George Orwell himself well before I mentioned that Supreme Court decision in the state of Minnesota about conspiracy theory and I also said that Abraham Lincoln had made reference to that prior and you have to remember that mr. Lincoln was a very seasoned trial attorney probably with the railroads most of the time with the railroads and he had become quite wealthy at that time doing so but he gave a speech in 18 I'm trying to think exactly where he gave it but I know it was his known as his house divided speech and it was actually a yeah it was given on his nomination by the Republican Party in Illinois as a candidate for the United States Senate here's what he said now compare this with the decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court quote we cannot absolutely know that all these exact adaptations are the results of pre concert but when we see a lot of frame timbers different portions of which we know have been gotten at different times and places by different workmen Stephen Franklin Roger and James for instance and when we see these timbers joined together and see they exactly make the frame of a house or a mill all of the tenons and mortises exactly fitting and all the lengths and proportions of the different pieces exactly adapted to their respective places and not a piece too many or a piece too few not omitting even scaffolding or if a single piece be lacking we see the place in the frame exactly fitted and prepared yet to bring that piece in in such a case we find it impossible not to believe that Stephen and Franklin and Roger and James all understood one another from the beginning and all worked upon a common plan or a draft drawn up before the first blow was struck unquote and as I said before when Olay made this speech he was speaking as a seasoned trial lawyer and in essence what he meant that if events are of a kind which ordinarily would not happen unless men plotted to advance a certain objective then we should not be inundated with doubt but may and should confidently postulate a conspiracy to accomplish that objective there is actually such a judicial standard for proving conspiracy in civil litigation and so that was the case I think the reference being made to the case in Minnesota now I don't believe it's possible folks that you know you're going to encounter it I promise you it's going to come up and that is none other than the word slavery because if you start talking about this oh the Civil War was fought over slavery everybody knows that if you've got a brain well slavery did entail money as we read from that hazard circular but what they were saying in Europe was it's easier to just pay them than it is to keep them up now and then of course they would control the wages which is what they stated in the hazard circular they would control labor by controlling wages are you any less a slave I I really don't see it and sometimes I get puzzled by this but you know today when we talk about politics but you know going back to that slavery thing how many of us were ever taught about the Freedom Party that was created and fielded a presidential candidate in both 1840 and 1844 that candidate being oh I'm sure all of you have all heard of James Gillespie Bernie yes oh yeah common everyday they teach them all the time right well James Bernie was a unique individual he was born in Kentucky to a family that had quite a few slaves he moved to Alabama where he decided that slavery was morally wrong and so he started pushing for it he freed all of his slaves he not only freed all of his slaves but he compensated them in money for their prior service as a slave on his plantation now why aren't we taught about that oh it must have been because mr. Bernie was from Alabama well he ran for president of the Freedom Party on the Freedom Party in both 1840 and in 1844 now folks stop and think about it if here was an opportunity for these wonderful benevolent Yankees to abolish slavery why would they not have supported the Freedom Party in 1840 and 1844 as a matter of fact in one of those elections mr. Bernie only got 7,000 votes 7,000 votes in a presidential election a little over 7,000 but he got 7,000 votes now and here was a push from the South with a political party from the South to abolish slavery now you can ask yourself and you can make the speculation well the people in the South who own slaves were not going to support that but what about the people in the north what about all these wonderful people who decided instead of supporting a party that wants to abolish slavery completely in this country instead of supporting them let's hire a criminal by the name of John Brown to go kill some people now who does that profit very simple question is it not folks I'm just going to kind of make a blanket statement here and tell you that the American Civil War could not and would not have happened if it had not been planned far in advance and as the one of the reasons that I would say that would be the aforementioned John Brown and the people who hired him folks how do you get people angry enough that they actually want to kill each other what how do you do that well you have to create and incite hatred well the opening salvo or the opening barrage and the campaign to sow hatred was Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin which was first serialized in a newspaper and then published in as a book in 1852 let me see this is right during the invasion by the illegal immigrants who were Marxist hmm it was not a reasoned argument against slavery because it was totally fictitional so it had no basis whatsoever in fact it was pure unadulterated fiction reaching a melodramatic climax which we you know we had to read that when I was in school where the sadistic master Simon Legree murders a kindly slave named Uncle Tom who pleads and I quote Massa if you was sick or you was in trouble or dying and I could save you I'd give you my heart's blood and if taking every drop of blood in this poor old body would save your precious soul I'd give them freely as the Lord gave his for me Oh master don't bring this great sin on your soul well unquote yeah isn't that wonderful but then according to Miss Stowe there was one hesitating pause one irresolute relenting thrill and the spirit of evil came back with sevenfold vehemence and Legree foaming with rage smote his victim to the ground unquote yeah my goodness look at that that is just absolutely that would have to be termed as malicious libel because this book was mass-marketed requiring vast forms of capital which could only have been supplied by the banking houses both in the United States and perhaps London this book was promoted lavishly like no other book ever before promoted in the history of Western civilization it was just ten times more copies were published and sold than any other work then known in the English-speaking world except for the Bible Mrs. Stowe's completely absurd book could not have gained a large readership without the kind of advertising and fanfare that only powerful connections and big money could assure publishing and promoting her work was like selling a low-grade Hollywood movie today it might be absolutely tasteless vulgar profanity everything else as so many of today's films are with all kind of aberrations of normal behavior but with enough capital it is possible to sell almost anything. Northerners read Mrs. Stowe's absolutely asinine book and then they became outraged because they believed it to be true. Southerners read these books and they were outraged too because they knew it was false there was enough anger on both sides to generate that desire I mentioned before of men to kill each other take each other's lives now exactly what the financiers behind Uncle Tom's Cabin desired. Okay Rebel Madman that's Uncle Tom's Cabin what's your nether... ah first day with my new lips folks I'm I apologize all right Rebel what's your next point well next in this series came a legislative adjustment in the federal territories concerning the institution of slavery in 1820 Missouri was admitted into the Union Missouri laid to the west of the Mississippi River on the other side of that Great Waterway the Ohio River and the Mason-Dixon line distinguished the modern industrialized society in the northern states from the feudal agrarian societies in the southern states by the two cultures could exist side by side on the same continental expanse they could never be mixed because each civilization was radically different from the other human beings somehow folks are remarkably territorial they will fight and kill for land to maintain their way of life if the latitude of the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers were extended in a westerly direction as a continuing boundary between the north and the south Missouri would have come into the Union without slavery yet because the planter agrarian way of life was well entrenched in Missouri when she applied for admission to the Union it was wholly impractical to prohibit slavery in that state now legislators from northern states wanted to be sure that they would get a good piece of these federal territories it was a desire to preserve an adequate domain for their civilization and their pocketbooks they were indifferent to slavery as a moral question but they knew that if the institution were firmly implanted anywhere it would be more difficult to implant their way and to implement their plans under the guidance of Henry Clay an accommodation was reached to allow the new state to enter with slavery the deal extended the southern boundary of Missouri which was at 36 degrees 30 minutes north latitude in a westerly direction cutting the federal territories in two parts now below that line were what we would call Indian lands or Oklahoma and what became Texas upon her admission to the Union some years later and their slavery was allowed by law above that line was then unorganized territory a major part of the Louisiana Purchase transacted in 1803 and their slavery was prohibited by law in that unorganized territory just to the west of Missouri lay what later became Kansas and to the north and west lay what later became Nebraska this Missouri compromise or some called it the compromise of 1820 was considered by statesman various statesman of the country as a solemn pact between the north and the south enabling those two civilizations to coexist within the same Union again under the guidance of Henry Clay the compromise of 1850 was reached to deal with the expanse of continent ceded two years earlier by Mexico to the United States this legislation did not formally prohibit slavery in the new federal territories nor was such an interdiction necessary because geography made it impossible to implant slavery to the south and west of the newest river in Texas or into or beyond Oklahoma or upon any part of the land acquired from Mexico aging patriots made these arrangements to save the Union the great ones among them Henry Clay Daniel Webster and John Colquhoun died by the end of 1852 and slavery began to pass into the mists of history all that was needed but the inflammatory language of Uncle Tom's cabin stirred up passions on both sides but even that baneful influence was not enough to prevent the compromises of 1820 and 1850 from doing their work if only they had remained untouched but they were not left untouched and the meddling hands as with Uncle Tom's cabin were again the hands of the large banking cabal this time financing a grand transcontinental railroad from the eastern end at Chicago through Iowa then across the unorganized territory to the north and the west of Missouri and from San Francisco on the Pacific Coast across territory ceded by Mexico until the two projects joined in Utah you know the Golden Railroad spike the difficulty here was that the South offered and wanted a shorter route from New Orleans through Texas thence by the Gila Valley to San Diego Stephen Douglas chairman of the Committee on Territories in the United States Senate wanted to be president very badly and he was supported in his ambition by the financiers behind the central route from Chicago to San Francisco now as a quid pro quo Douglas supported the central route which those financiers wanted in order to buy off enough southern votes to get the central route Douglas secured passage of the Kansas the Kansas Nebraska Act in 1854 this legislation established the Kansas territory and the Nebraska territory and included a provision repealing the prohibition of slavery in the Louisiana Purchase above 36 degrees 30 minutes north latitude latitude as ordained by the Missouri Compromise now there were some great southerners who opposed this sale of the Missouri Compromise to suit the demands of political ambition railroad building and high finance among them was Sam Houston of Texas but enough southerners went along including some good men who did not appreciate the magnitude of their own mistake the repeal meant that the Kansas territory directly to the west of Missouri was open to settlement both to people from the north with their way of life and people from the south with their way of life in the majority of the federal territories such a possibility really would not matter because the climate and the terrain just didn't accommodate slavery but there was one exception of all places within the Kansas territory in a small region along the Kansas and Missouri rivers hemp and tobacco might have been profitably grown and harvested by slave labor that was enough to bring people from both the north and the south into the Kansas territory as night falls day a civil war broke out between the two populations in 1855 and it continued on for several years hatred had been incited by the large banking cabal financing libel and a battleground had been arranged by large banking houses financing a railroad the hostilities erupting in the new territory were a kind of dress rehearsal for the big event coming up which would be the misnamed Civil War now a lot of howling and posturing over the years has been written and spoken of called bleeding Kansas but it believe it or not it was stirred up by Salmon P. Chase of Ohio and Charles Sumner of Massachusetts in the United States Senate both of them were closely allied to northern railroad northern industry and northern banking interest for it was practically impossible for anybody in the United States Senate from a state above the Mason-Dixon line and the Ohio River not to have conversations with individuals representing such powerful concerns but in spite of Chasen Sumner the trouble in the Kansas Territory was settled and out of it came a new state admitted to the Union without slavery in 1861 the most interesting feature of this is that it was not the likes of Chasen Sumner but southern statesman who caused the fighting to end in the Kansas Territory it was these southern statesman who caused peaceful voting to occur votes to be honestly counted and a new free state to enter the Union to name a couple of those let's include Roger Toombs, Robert Toombs of Georgia and territorial governors Robert Walker of Mississippi and Frederick Stanton of Tennessee well folks I thought of trying to include the next table leg here of the creation of the climate to have the wall of northern aggression or the war of bankers aggression I guess would be a good phrase but I realized the end to go in depth with Dred Scott and to show how it was in fact another shot at and a plan to devise and create conflict and to promote the war so I'll do that in our next episode of Whistlin' Dixie thanks folks for tuning in I certainly appreciate it God bless and have yourself a wonderful day