Principles Too

The speaker discusses the harm of sharing anger towards people, places, organizations, or institutions. They attempt to make a complaint about confusion but realize that holding onto resentment can lead to spreading hatred. They later discover that they were targeted with hate and fabrications, but managed to resolve their own resentments. The speaker emphasizes the need to make a clear statement that cannot be easily denied. They choose not to reveal how the curse was accomplished. Most of us realize that it's harmful to share our anger about people, places, organizations or institutions. But the state, which is required to take complaints, isn't likely to object to our effort. So I thought I would get away with making a complaint about confusion. I wrote out my resentments against people and places and I said my prayers. But because I hung on to my case against equivocation or ambiguity, which my mentor advised against as well, bitter ash of my resentments was flung about in order to teach the hazard of aiming hatred of any kind in any direction. It took years for me to find out that I had been a target of hate while fabrications were used to separate me from my family. The material was so subtle and preposterous that I didn't see how it could pertain to me. And I accomplished that feat by opening up about my own resentments and resolving them with measures I used to prove that I care about my fellow man. But it doesn't matter if I get all worked up about devices used to deny the claim. So I return yet again to make another statement in this form that isn't as easily denied by word salads or the obfuscation of editors. We'd rather not say how the curse was accomplished.