Details
Nothing to say, yet
Comment
Nothing to say, yet
Listen to patanjali vs supreme court by mobbesshera rayeen MP3 song. patanjali vs supreme court song from mobbesshera rayeen is available on Audio.com. The duration of song is 17:01. This high-quality MP3 track has 273.598 kbps bitrate and was uploaded on 27 Apr 2024. Stream and download patanjali vs supreme court by mobbesshera rayeen for free on Audio.com – your ultimate destination for MP3 music.
Comment
Loading comments...
Patanjali is a well-known brand in India founded by Baba Ramdev, a yoga guru and businessman. The brand gained popularity by offering traditional Ayurvedic products like cow ghee, toothpaste, shampoos, and soaps. Patanjali's emphasis on quality and affordability has posed a threat to established market leaders. However, the brand has faced controversy for making misleading claims about its products. The Supreme Court has taken note of these violations and issued notices to Patanjali and its founder, Baba Ramdev. The case highlights the importance of adhering to court orders and responsible marketing practices. The Drugs and Magic Remedies Objectionable Advertisement Act is a law in India that regulates the advertisement of drugs and remedies, prohibiting false claims and imposing penalties for violations. The Patanjali misleading ad case in the Supreme Court involves the publication of objectionable and misleading advertisements, and the court has demanded explanations and original cop video is going to be about why SC is so harsh on Baba Ramdev. But first, we need to know who is this well-known figure in India named Ramdev Baba. Born Ramakrishnan Yadav between 1965 and 1975, who was an Indian yoga guru, businessman and a face of Patanjali Ayurveda. The modern-day Ramdev is renowned for promoting yoga, Ayurveda and traditional medicines in India, organizing large yoga camps and co-founding Patanjali Ayurveda in 2006. Recently, he has been in the news for seeking mercy from judges in a case related to misleading advertisements about his traditional Ayurvedic medicines which claims to cure chronic diseases like diabetes. To know about when this brand started, we need to know that the brand started in 2002 when Baba Ramdev mass yoga camps were telecasted through leading spiritual channels which were new trends at that time. The brand gained importance in the market with its rapid growth and popularity, becoming a household name in India within a few years. Patanjali Ayurveda is bagged by thousands of franchise outlets across the country in both rural and urban areas. This brand's success can be contributed to its focus on the traditional Ayurvedic products which resonate with consumers seeking natural and herbal remedies. Patanjali's products range in like the cow ghee, gunskanthi toothpaste, shampoos, soaps and which have become immensely popular with the market. The brand's emphasis on quality and affordability has helped it pose a real threat to the established market leaders like Colgate, Unilever, Nestle and many more. If we see what are the most famous products of Patanjali that they include in their range, first stands cow ghee. Patanjali Ayurveda earned a revenue of Rs 1467 crores from only cow ghee, making it a significant product in the fragmented market with several unorganized players. It is a direct rival to Amul in the organized branded ghee market which accounts for about 44% of volumes in the overall market. Second product which is very famous is gunskanthi toothpaste. It earned a revenue of Rs 940 crores from the segment. The company said its share in the market stood at 14% at the end of March. Rivals include market leaders Colgate, Palmolive India Ltd and Dabar India Ltd. Next we have Ayurvedic medicines. Patanjali earned of almost Rs 870 crores of revenue with Ayurvedic medicines, nearly four times compared to its direct rival Dabar India. Very famous product again stands Keshkanti shampoo and their soap. Keshkanti shampoos single-handedly contributed a revenue of Rs 825 crores for Patanjali. In the market leader with a 45% share in the shampoo and the India's largest consumer goods maker earned Rs 16,304 crores from the personal care segment which includes shampoo and soap brands like Dubb, Sunsilk, Prasame and Lux and skincare products like Parallel and Coinscream. Next we have soaps. Patanjali herbal soap segment mopped up a revenue of Rs 574 crores. HUL, the maker of Lifebuoy and the maker market leader in soap followed by rivals like Nirma, Godrej Consumer Products and IPC. These products have contributed significantly to the Patanjali's growth and success in the market. Patanjali product line has evolved significantly over time expanding to cover a wide range of categories to meet consumer demands and market trends. Initially known for its focus on Ayurvedic and natural products, Patanjali has diversified its offering to include various segments such as food items, personal care products, health supplements, herbal medicines, cosmetics and even much more. The expansion has allowed Patanjali to cater to a broader consumer base including health conscious individuals seeking natural and holistic well-being solutions. The brand product line evolution reflects its commitment to providing high quality affordable products that harness the power of Ayurveda and traditional Indian wisdom. Additionally, Patanjali's product range has grown to include items like ghee, toothpaste, shampoo, soaps and herbal remedies which have become popular choices among consumers as we talked about. Overall, Patanjali's strategic product line evolution has played a crucial role in its success and market presence, enabling them to compete effectively in the highly competitive S&PG industry in India. Now, if we go to the controversy, the first case against Patanjali was filed by Kannur based ophthalmologist K. V. Babu on February 22, 2022 with the Kerala Drugs Control Department. The case was related to Divya Pharmacy, a subsidiary of Patanjali Ayurveda, which was accused of making misleading claims about its products. In addition to this, the Indian Medical Association filed a case against Patanjali in Supreme Court in 2023, alleging that the company had made misleading claims about its products and violated the undertaking given to the court not to publish misleading advertisements. The Supreme Court took a note of the violation and issued false notices to Patanjali Ayurveda and its managing director. Acharya Balakrishna, for allegedly slouching the previous order, the court also decided to issue a notice to Baba Ramdev, the founder of Patanjali, for his alleged role in this matter. The court noted that no reply had been filed to the February 27 notice and pulled up the centre for not taking action against Patanjali for violating the law and making misleading claims about its products. The case highlights the importance of adhering to court orders and the consequences of violating them. It also highlights the need for company to be transparent and responsible in their marketing and advertising practices. A total of two significant complaints have been filed against Patanjali. The first complaint against Patanjali as the top was filed in Kannur based ophthalmologist K. V. Babu on February 2022 with the Kerala Drugs Control Department. Second was filed by Indian Medical Association, IMA, filed a case against Patanjali in the Supreme Court in 2023, alluding misleading claims about its products, violating the court's undertaking not to publish misleading advertisements. The Drugs and Marijuana Remedies Objectionable Advertisement Act, 1954 is a law enacted in India to regulate the advertisement of drugs and remedies. This is to understand the first case which was filed against Baba Ramdev. It prohibited advertisements of drugs and remedies that claimed to have medical properties and made doing so a cognisable offense. The Act defines marijuana remedy as a saliciman mantra, amulet or any other object that is claimed to have miraculous power to cure diabetes, prevent or mitigate a disease in humans or animals. It includes a list of 54 diseases and conditions for which there are no accepted remedies and any advertisement related to these diseases or conditions is prohibited. The Act also includes provision for penalties for violation with a maximum sentence of 6 months of imprisonment with or without fine for the first conviction and up to 1 year for subsequent conviction. The law applies to whole of India including Jammu and Kashmir and applies to persons domiciled in the countries to which this Act extends who are outside the Fed's territory. The Act also provides for the power to make rules for carrying out the purpose of this Act. The Drugs and Magic Remedies Objectionable Advertisement Act, 1954 is a significant law in India that protects consumers from false and misleading claims. It is essential for ensuring the safety and the efficacy of drugs and remedies and preventing the exploitation of vulnerable individuals. The Patanjali Misleading Act case in the Supreme Court refers to a contempt of court case against Patanjali Ayurveda, its co-founder Baba Ramdev and his associate Acharya Balakrishnan for publishing objectionable and misleading advertisements about their Ayurvedic products. The case began in November 2023 when the Supreme Court issued a notice to Patanjali for violating an undertaking given to the court to stop publishing such advertisements. In April 2024, the Supreme Court asked Patanjali if its apology published in the newspaper was as big and expensive as its usual front-page advertisements for herbal drugs. The court was unhappy with the academics expressing regret over their actions and wanted to see the original newspaper in which the apology was published. The court also sought an explanation from the Ayush Ministry for the sudden omission of Rule 170, which tells of the power of taking action against objectionable advertisements from the drugs and cosmetic rules. Patanjali has spent 10 lakhs to convey its regrets for misleading the public, but the court wanted to know if the apology was published with the same size in the font as the advertisements it normally issues in newspapers. The court has also inflicted the licensing authorities on the drug controllers under Ayush and did not spare the Indian Medical Association, which had moved the Supreme Court against Patanjali. The court expressed concern over the dementiative scale of Patanjali public apology advertisements and instructed the company to physically extract the offending advertisements from the newspaper and submit them. The court has asked the IMA to get its house in order and said it would look into a phenomenon of inflated bills and doctors allegedly prescribing overpriced medicine brands in cahoots with pharmaceutical companies. In summary, the Patanjali misleading ad case in the Supreme Court is a significant legal matter involving the publication of objectionable and misleading advertisements about Ayurvedic products. The court is taking a tough stance on the matter and has asked the company to submit original copies of its apologies published in the newspaper, scrutinize the misleading advertisements and explain the sudden omission of Rule 170 from the Drugs and the Cosmetic Rules 1945. The court has also inflicted the licensing authorities that comes under Ayush. They, Indian Medical Association over potential laxity in standards for ads for allopathic and medical products. The specific misleading ads that was accused of the Patanjali of publishing were related to its Ayurvedic products which claimed that they have medical efficiency or discouraging statements against the offer systems of medicine, particularly allopathy. The Indian Medical Association has filed a petition in the Supreme Court in August 2022 alleging that they have consistently de-integrated allopathy that made exaggerated claims about the efficacy of its own drugs which contradicted regulations banning such advertisements in countries. The IMA accused Patanjali of contributing to vaccine hesitancy during the COVID times, making false and unfounded claims about curing various diseases like Corona. The Supreme Court has issued notice in Patanjali 2023, warning the company against the claiming that its products could completely cure disease and threatened to impose a cost of Rs 1 crore on every product for which such claim was made. However, Patanjali continued to publish misleading ads, leading to a contempt of court case against the company. Its co-founder Baba Ramdev and his associate Acharya Balakrishna, the court had issued a blanket ban on any further advertisement or branding of Patanjali of medicinal products until the further. In response to the accusation of publishing misleading ads, Patanjali Ayurveda issued a public apology in leading newspapers, which as said, was not accepted by the Supreme Court. Patanjali Ayurveda Limited, founded by Yoga Guru and Baba Ramdev, apologized for its contentious advertisements to India's top court that had last month restrained the company from marketing them and their products. Patanjali's competitors have likely been closely watching the court's ruling and the subsequent response from Patanjali regarding the misleading cases. While there is no explicit mention of their reactions in the search results, the case has set a significant precedent for advertising regulations and consumer's production in India. The Supreme Court intervention in the case highlights the importance of truthfulness and accuracy in advertising and the need for the company to uphold ethical standards to avoid legal entanglement and maintain public trust. As a result, Patanjali's competitors may be more cautious in their advertising process and practices to avoid similar legal consequences. Additionally, the court's scrutiny of the IMA and NMC indicates a broader focus on ethical practices in the healthcare and medical industries, which may impact Patanjali's competitors in those sectors. Overall, the court's ruling has set a significant precedent on advertising regulations and consumer protection in India, and Patanjali's competitors are likely to take note of the legal and ethical implications of their advertising practices. So, this was all about the Patanjali case in the Supreme Court. I hope we filled you with the relevant information that you were looking for. If you think we left on anything, please let us know in the comment section. We are open to feedback. But if you like this video, then please like, share and subscribe to Lifebeats. You can also follow the trending news on our website and social media handles. This is your host, Ugasra Sajeev Lain, from the team of LifeScoop, signing off. Thank you.
There are no comments yet.
Be the first! Share your thoughts.
