Joe rogan use this
Transcription
The speaker argues against assigning a number to happiness, stating that it reduces a complex concept to a simplistic measurement. They believe that happiness is a result of managing one's thoughts and decisions, which can fluctuate throughout the day. They compare it to the tide, with ups and downs. Happiness is never static and can be influenced by physical well-being. Overall, they believe that happiness cannot be accurately measured or quantified. that way. I definitely wouldn't give it a number. Okay. Cause I feel like you're, you're making something you're, you're turning like a constant state of thinking and expression and consideration. You're turning it into a number. And I just, I don't like that idea. I don't like that idea because I think it's a management issue. I think a lot of what happiness is is a management issue and decisions that you're making right now. Like you could be in a shit state of mind right now, but you can make some decisions to adjust that. And over the next couple of hours you'll get to a much better place. And these constant management decisions, they waver in and out of your life on a daily basis. Like this idea that you could have a good mindset, then all of a sudden, you'll be happy. That's horseshit. Like it's, that's like, it's like the tide. It comes in and it comes down. There's going to be days where you're just not feeling so good physically. And that's going to affect the way your happiness level is. It's never static. It's never exactly the same. True. But if you looked at it overall at 30,000 feet.
