Final

The transcription discusses the social analysis of the 1991 film "Boys in the Hood," focusing on how structural inequality shapes human behavior, particularly in communities dealing with social challenges. The film portrays how violence is tied to social conditions and historical inequalities, with a central focus on urban violence shaped by structural disparities. Various sociological perspectives are applied, such as functionalism, Durkheim's concept of anomie, and conflict theory, to explain the societal issues depicted in the film. The importance of understanding broader social forces and using sociological theory to analyze real-world problems, particularly in law enforcement, is emphasized. The project reinforces the value of sociological frameworks in addressing community issues and improving public safety strategies. The narrator identifies with Wilson's structural approach as it highlights the role of structural inequalities in shaping behavior. Welcome and thank you for joining me for this Social Analysis of Boys in the Hood, the 1991 film written and directed by John Sandleton. As a criminal justice student and an executive law enforcement professional, this film has always resonated with me, not just as a cinema piece, but as a reflection of real communities dealing with layered social challenges. That's why I selected this film for the project. It allowed us to examine how structural inequality shapes human behavior, and more specifically, how environments shaped by disinvestment, segregation, and limited mobility can produce cycles of violence. The story follows three young black men, Trey, Ricky, and Joe Boy, growing up in South Central Los Angeles. Although they live in the same neighborhood, their pasts unfold differently. They saw primary structure, institutional support, and access to opportunity. The setting isn't just the backdrop. It acts almost like another character. Limited schooling, heavy policing, and low social investment placed consistent pressure on the people living there. Violence appears frequently, but the film makes it clear that violence isn't random. It's tied to social conditions and historically rooted inequalities. Urban violence shaped by structural inequalities is the central social issue I focused on for this analysis. The film illustrates how that violence emerges from poverty, racial segregation, underfunded institutions, and fractured relationships between community members and law enforcement. According to Turner, 2013, social structures shaped people's behavior by either providing or failing to provide stability, norms, and pathways to success. This is 45 through 47. When structures fail, people often adapt in ways that may be labeled deviant. In the movie, Joe Boy embodies this pattern. He's intelligent and observant, but symptomatic barriers limit his choices, and he navigates his world through informal codes of survival. Research helps us understand these patterns even more clearly. Elijah Anderson's Code of the Street explains how communities that lack consistent institutional support develops alternative norms to maintain order. 1999, pages 33 through 36. Respect, retaliation, and toughness becomes forms of social capital. The film shows this as Joe Boy and his peers learn early that their safety depends on projecting strength and responding to disrespect. These behaviors are sociologically understandable when you consider the environment they live in. To explain the relationship between the social environment and violence in the film, I use the functionalist perspective. Functionalism examines how institutions are intended to work together to maintain stability. When institutions such as family, education, policing, and economic systems break down, dysfunction occurs. As Turner, 2013, notes, dysfunction appears when institutions fail to fulfill their intended role. Pages 51 through 53. South Central is portrayed as a community where institutions are not functioning well, forcing people to rely on informal systems and survival strategies that can contribute to violence. Classical sociological theory also depends on this analysis. Emile Durkheim's concept of anomie describes a state of normalness that occurs when social structures fail to provide clear guidance. Behind the hood, many young men experience uncertainty about how to achieve success because traditional pathways, education, employment, and community support are unstable or unaccessible. According to Turner, 2013, anomie emerges when society's expectations remain high, but opportunities are limited. Page 84. The emotional fatigue, frustration, and fatalism expressed by Doboy directly affects this condition. A contemporary theory that adds further insight is conflict theory. Modern conflict theorists argue that inequality is maintained through systems of power that benefit dominant groups. Segregated neighborhoods, limited economic investment, and unequal law enforcement practices are not accidents. They are the outcome of historical power imbalances and policy decisions. Turner, 2013, argues that conflict theory highlights how dominant groups maintain advantage through resource allocation institutional design. Pages 120-123. In the film, these dynamics appear in school funding disparities, economic segregation, and strained police-community interactions. To expand this analysis, I reviewed two opposing sociological perspectives. Elijah Anderson's work emphasizes cultural adaptations. He argues that violence emerges from informal neighborhood norms shaped by weakened institutions. William Julius Wilson, on the other hand, argues in The Truly Disadvantaged that structural forces are the primary drivers of urban violence, including job loss, economic restructuring, and concentrated poverty. 2012, pages 21-24. Anderson focuses on culture. Wilkis focuses on structure. Both perspectives appear in the film. Street code is visible in daily interactions, but so is structural abandonment. Seen in Ricky's struggle for educational mobility and the limited opportunities available to the boy. Together, these theories and research shows that the violence in boys in the hood is not the result of individual failure. but the predictable outcomes of broader social forces. This aligns with critical theory from Turner's chapter 33, which argues that social problems are shaped by structural domination and historical inequalities, not simply by individual actions. Turner, 2013, pages 255-257. Critical theorists remind us to look at who benefits from inequality and how power is maintained through economic and political systems. This also connects the feminist theory, particularly in the new materialism described in Jagger's 2015 article. New materialism argues that social outcomes arise from the interaction between material conditions and cultural forces, not from discourse alone. This view helps us understand that the bodies of young black men in the film are not just symbolically read-through culture stereotypes. They are materially shaped by their environment, access to resources, and exposure to danger. Jagger, 2015, emphasizes that matters such as the lived physical body interacts with social systems to produce real effects, rather than simply reflecting on discourse. Pages 321-326. The film shows this clearly. The young men lived experiences of stress, hypervigilance, and trauma are materially rooted in their environment. The representation of urban violence in the film to real world conditions, the accuracy is striking. As someone who worked in law enforcement for years, I have witnessed how structural inequality shapes patterns of crime and victimization. Community with fewer resources, less stable institutions, and limited access to opportunities often experience more violence. This isn't because of the people themselves, but because of the systems surrounding them. The film accurately reflects how stress, instability, and marginalization contribute to cycles of harm. It also reflects the frustration that many residents feel towards law enforcement when interactions are shaped by mistrust on both sides. The theories I use in my analysis, functionalism, darkens enemies, and conflict theory applies to real world as well. Functionalism helps explain how institutional failures produce instability. Enemy helps us understand feelings of hopelessness and deviance in environments with limited opportunity. Conflict theory helps explain racial and economic inequality Conflict theory helps explain racial and economic inequality and its relationship to crime. I would apply the same theories to real world cases, because they offer frameworks that move beyond individual blame towards a deeper understanding of how social systems shape behavior. Sociological theory also helps challenge personal and societal assumptions. Many people assume that violence in marginalized communities is the result of moral failures or lack of discipline. But when we use theory to analyze these issues, we see that violence often emerges from social patterns, not individual choices alone. Example, Durkheim's Enemy shows that when norms collapse, people often feel disconnected and powerless. This is an experience that can lead to harmful behavior. Understanding this can help law enforcement leaders like myself approach humanity issues with empathy and a broader institutional perspective. Reflecting on my own career goals, this project has reinforced how vital sociological theory is to my professional development. My research interest focuses on community, police relationships, and theories like conflict theory. And functionalism helps explain why mistrust persists and how it can be repaired. I identify strongly with the functionalist perspective because my work requires building systems that are stable, coordinated, and effective. But conflict theory also plays a role because it forces me to confront the power dynamics that shape interactions between the public and law enforcement. Understanding both perspectives helps me make more informed decisions as I work towards my goal of becoming a Deputy Director General. It helps me recognize not just what is happening in communities, but why is it happening. Applying sociological theories to Boys in the Hood also helped me appreciate the value of these frameworks in analyzing real-world problems. It reminded me that behind every social issue are patterns and patterns of behavior. Behind every social issue are patterns, structures, histories, and people who deserve thoughtful, evidence-based approaches. This project strengthens my commitment to using sociological insight to improve public safety strategies and community partnerships. After reviewing both Anderson and Wilson, the theory that most closely aligns with my perspective is Wilson's structural approach. While neighborhood norms matter, structural inequalities is the deeper and more persistent force shaping urban violence. The film supports this by showing how poverty, segregation, and institutional neglect sets the stage for harmful behaviors long before individual decisions are made. The film also challenges stereotypes by showing the complexities of life in marginalized communities. It avoids the simplistic narrative that young black men are inherently violent by highlighting how intelligent, caring, and hopeful they are despite their circumstances. The film reveals how societal structures not individual traits shape opportunities. Finally, using a sociological lens, I believe that the film has a positive impact on society. It encourages viewers to question their assumptions about crime, race, and community life. Supported by research and theory, the film invites the public to see urban violence not as a natural condition but as a consequence of social structures that can be changed. In that sense, it conducts a public understanding and pushes for empathy, reform, and accountability. References Anderson E. 1999 Code of the Street Deviancy, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City W. W. Norton Jagger G. 2015 Jagger G. 2015 The New Materialism and Sexual Differences Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society 42 321 322 Singleton J. 1991 Boys in the Hood Columbia Pictures Turner J. H. 2013 Contemporary Sociological Theory Sage Publication Wilson W. J. 2012 The Truly Disadvantaged The Inner City The Underclass and the Public Policy University of Chicago Press