ספר איפאק

AIPAC, the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, is a powerful lobbying group that advocates for Israel in the US. It was founded by Isaiah Leo Sykinen, who used a unique lobbying strategy called the Inverted Pyramid. AIPAC focused on building grassroots support by mobilizing ordinary citizens and leveraging existing Jewish organizations. They also created their own newspaper, the Near East Report, to shape the narrative around Israel. AIPAC faced scrutiny over allegations of being a foreign agent but was able to prove that their funding came from private donations within the US. All right, everyone, buckle up, because today we are diving deep into the story of AIPAC. AIPAC, you say. Now, that's a name that carries some weight in Washington. It sure does, and for good reason. The American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC as it's better known, has consistently been one of the most effective, some might even say powerful, foreign policy lobbies in the U.S. And it all started, believe it or not, with a guy named Isaiah Leo Sykinen, operating out of a, get this, a one-room office with little more than a telephone and a dream. A true underdog story, and that's exactly what we're unpacking in this deep dive. We're going back to AIPAC's roots, using excerpts from a historical analysis that really focuses on the organization's early years under Sykinen's leadership. The book paints a fascinating portrait of a man who was absolutely single-minded in his determination to build support for Israel in the U.S., and what's so intriguing is that he did it by basically inventing a whole new way of lobbying, a model he called the Inverted Pyramid. The Inverted Pyramid. Okay, I am intrigued. But before we get into the nuts and bolts of this Inverted Pyramid, let's set the stage a bit. We're talking about the aftermath of World War II. The world is still reeling from the horrors of the Holocaust. Jewish refugees are desperately seeking a homeland, and there's this whole debate raging about the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine. It was a turbulent time, no doubt about it. And you've got to remember, this is long before 24-7 news cycles, before social media, before most people even owned a television, trying to rally support for a brand-new country in that environment. Talk about an uphill battle. It really puts things into perspective, doesn't it? So you've got this incredibly complex historical backdrop, and then you have Kinan, a man who had already cut his teeth, so to speak, working with the American Jewish Conference, the AJC. Ah, the AJC, a pivotal player in all of this. Under the leadership of Rabbi Abba Halah Silver and Rabbi Stephen Wise, they were really on the front lines, advocating for Jewish refugees and pushing for the creation of a Jewish state. Right. And Kinan was right there in the thick of it, learning the ropes, so to speak. Yes. Did his time with the AJC, under these really prominent figures, did that experience influence his approach when he eventually took the helm at AIBAC? Absolutely. His time with the AJC was like a training ground. He learned from some of the best in the business about how to build a movement, how to rally people around a cause, and most importantly, how to effectively apply pressure to decision makers. These were all skills that would serve him well when he founded AIBAC. So Kinan takes the reins at AIBAC. What were some of the biggest challenges he faced right out of the gate? What were his priorities? Well, one of the most pressing issues was securing financial aid for Israel. Remember, this is a brand new country, still finding its footing, surrounded by hostile neighbors and in desperate need of resources. And I'm imagining it wasn't exactly a walk in the park to convince the U.S. government to open up its checkbook, especially given the, shall we say, delicate political situation in the Middle East. You're telling me. The U.S. was trying to walk this very fine line, wanting to support Israel, but also wary of alienating Arab nations. It was a real balancing act. So how did Kinan navigate those choppy waters? How did he convince the powers that be in Washington that supporting Israel was in America's best interest? Well, he was very strategic about it. Instead of framing it as charity or even just a moral obligation, Kinan very cleverly presented aid to Israel as part of a broader regional strategy. His argument was that by supporting Israel, the U.S. was contributing to stability in the Middle East, which, of course, was in everyone's best interest. It's brilliant when you think about it. He turned what could have been seen as a handout into a strategic investment, a win-win for everyone involved. Exactly. And it worked. He managed to secure much-needed aid for Israel while also solidifying the idea that a strong U.S.-Israel relationship was beneficial for both countries. But here's where things get really interesting. Oh, we do love a good plot twist. Kinan had another crucial realization, a sort of aha moment, if you will, that would shape AIPAC's future. He realized that for AIPAC to be truly effective in the long run, it couldn't be seen as just an arm of the Israeli government. So he wanted to avoid that whole foreign agent label. Exactly. Kinan understood that to have real influence in Washington, AIPAC needed to be seen as a purely American organization advocating for what they perceived as U.S. interests. So he wanted AIPAC to be seen as an American organization advocating for American interests, even though their focus was on supporting Israel. I get it. That's a brilliant strategy. But how do you actually pull that off? How do you build that kind of influence, especially when you're starting from scratch? Well, that's where Kinan's brilliance really shines through, and it all comes back to that inverted pyramid model we talked about earlier. Right, the inverted pyramid. It sounds more like a business school case study than a lobbying strategy. So remind us, how does this whole inverted pyramid thing actually work? Okay. Imagine a pyramid, but flip it upside down. Instead of a small, powerful elite at the top, you have thousands, tens of thousands of ordinary citizens at the base. These are your school teachers, your doctors, your shopkeepers, your local community leaders, all mobilized and activated to contact their elected officials and voice their support for Israel. So it's about harnessing the power of the people, a true grassroots movement. But how do you even begin to organize something like that, especially back then, with none of the tools we have today? That's where Kinan's experience with the AGC proved so valuable. He'd learned that building coalitions, working with existing networks, was far more effective than trying to create something entirely new from scratch. So he wasn't reinventing the wheel. He was just, well, flipping the pyramid. Exactly. He was a master strategist. That's for sure. And one of his smartest moves was to tap into existing Jewish organizations that already had chapters all across the country, groups like Hadassah, for example, with its huge network of members who are already passionate about supporting Israel. So instead of starting from zero, he's leveraging the infrastructure and the reach of these established groups. Precisely. He essentially turned them into local chapters of AIPAC, providing them with information, talking points, even draft letters they could send to their representatives in Congress. And it wasn't just Hadassah. Kinan cultivated relationships with synagogues, community centers, you name it, weaving this incredibly intricate tapestry of grassroots support. So he's giving them the tools to become advocates, to make their voices heard in Washington. But it's not just about numbers, right? It's about making sure those voices are informed, that they're carrying a consistent message. You hit the nail on the head. Information is power. And Kinan understood that better than anyone, which is why another crucial piece of this inverted pyramid puzzle was the creation of AIPAC's own newspaper, the Near East Report. Ah, yes. The Near East Report. We touched on that earlier. So it was more than just a newsletter, right? More than just AIPAC tooting their own horn. Oh, much more than that. It was a strategic masterpiece. Think of it as a carefully curated blend of news digest, opinion pieces, and most importantly, a call to action, all packaged in a way that was both informative and incredibly persuasive. So Kinan's essentially creating his own media platform, shaping the narrative around Israel, and then delivering that narrative directly to a built-in audience of potential advocates who are primed and ready to take action. Exactly. And you have to remember, this was long before the internet, before 24-7 news cycles. If you were someone who cared about Israel, who wanted to stay informed, the Near East Report was your lifeline. It was the source. It's brilliant, really. But I have to imagine that this kind of influence, this level of organization, it didn't go unnoticed. Did they face any pushback as they grew? Were there any attempts to, say, discredit AIPAC or investigate their activities? Oh, absolutely. As AIPAC's influence grew, so did the scrutiny. And one of the biggest challenges they faced stemmed from that whole foreign agent issue we discussed earlier. Right, that whole idea that they were secretly taking orders from the Israeli government. Exactly. In the early 1960s, AIPAC actually came under investigation for their funding sources. Some people were convinced they were receiving money from the Israeli government, which would have been a direct violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act, FAR. That's pretty serious stuff. Yeah. How did AIPAC handle that kind of pressure? Well, it was a tense time, for sure. But Kinnan, as always, was prepared. He was able to produce documentation proving that AIPAC's funding came primarily from private donations and membership fees within the U.S., no secret back channels, no foreign interference. So they were cleared of any wrongdoing. Exactly. And that was a huge victory for AIPAC. It not only silenced their critics, at least for the time being, but it also reinforced their image as a legitimate American organization operating above board and within the bounds of the law. It seems like Kinnan had an incredible knack for anticipating challenges and maneuvering around obstacles. But even the most brilliant strategists eventually retire. What happened when Kinnan stepped down in 1976? Did his inverted pyramid, this whole system he built, did it go with him? So Kinnan rides off into the sunset, leaving behind this incredibly well-oiled machine, this inverted pyramid he built from the ground up. Did it survive without its architect? It didn't just survive. It thrived. In fact, the author of this book we're looking at argues that Kinnan's model, especially his emphasis on grassroots mobilization, became even more central to AIPAC's success in the years after his departure. That's quite a legacy. What in your view were the key ingredients that made his approach so effective, so enduring? Well, I think a big part of it was Kinnan's almost uncanny ability to build relationships. He understood that to be truly effective, to really move the needle in Washington, AIPAC couldn't be seen as a one-sided partisan player. He knew they had to build bridges across the aisle. Bipartisanship. It's a word we hear a lot, but it's so much easier said than done, especially when you're dealing with something as complex and often controversial as foreign policy. You're telling me. But Kinnan was a master at finding that common ground, at appealing to both Democrats and Republicans. He framed support for Israel not as a partisan issue, not as a matter of ideology, but as something fundamental to America's own security and strategic interests. So it wasn't just about tugging at heartstrings or appealing to people's sense of, say, moral obligation. It was a much more pragmatic, some might even say hard-nosed approach. Exactly. He knew how to speak the language of power, how to make the case for Israel in a way that resonated with the folks on Capitol Hill, regardless of their party affiliation. And it wasn't just about shaping opinions within the U.S., right? Didn't Kinnan also recognize the importance of cultivating support for Israel on the international stage? Absolutely. He understood that Israel's survival, its ability to thrive, depended not just on having a strong advocate in Washington, but also on securing its place within the broader international community. Any particular examples of that come to mind? Well, the book talks about AIPAC's efforts to counter British pressure on Israel in the 1950s, particularly after the Suez crisis. Britain at that time still wielded considerable influence in the Middle East, and they were trying to, shall we say, keep Israel's ambitions in check. Kinnan saw that and realized that AIPAC had to be active on multiple fronts, not just lobbying Congress, but also working to shape international opinion. So they're almost like a shadow diplomatic corps working behind the scenes to build support for Israel, to counter negative narratives, to make sure Israel had a voice in those international arenas. That's a great way to put it. And it speaks to Kinnan's vision. His understanding that AIPAC couldn't afford to be single-minded or operate in a vacuum. They had to be agile, adaptable, and willing to engage on multiple levels. This whole deep dive has been so eye-opening. We often hear about these powerful lobbying groups, but we rarely get to pull back the curtain and see the gears turning, so to speak. And what I find so fascinating about AIPAC's story, particularly under Kinnan's leadership, is that their success wasn't about, you know, shady backroom deals or throwing money around. It was about organization. It was about strategy. But most importantly, it was about people. Harnessing the power of the people. It's a powerful reminder that even in this seemingly impenetrable world of Washington politics, grassroots movements, when they're well-organized and strategic, can have a real impact. Absolutely. But it also gives you pause, doesn't it? This whole inverted pyramid model that Kinnan pioneered, it's a powerful tool. And like any tool, it can be used for good or for ill. That's a really crucial point for our listeners to consider. This deep dive isn't just some history lesson, some interesting anecdote from the past. These strategies, this playbook, it's still relevant today. Oh, absolutely. Whether you're passionate about, say, climate change or social justice or economic inequality, understanding how to effectively advocate for change, how to mobilize people, how to navigate the levers of power, that's essential knowledge in today's world. Couldn't agree more. So as you're learning about the issues you care about, as you encounter organizations trying to influence policy, take a moment to consider their methods. Are they mobilizing grassroots support? Are they shaping the narrative? Are they building those crucial relationships? Understanding how these tactics work, that's the first step to becoming a more informed, more engaged, and ultimately more effective citizen. And who knows? Maybe you'll even be inspired to build your own inverted pyramid and fight for the causes you believe in. Until next time, stay curious, everyone.