Details
Here is another informative audio clip on the Panama Canal and why it should be back under the control of the United States. Once again, explained by our newest Secretary of State, Marco Rubio – Audio clip taken from No Agenda Show #1736 with Adam Curry and John C Dvorak.
Comment
Here is another informative audio clip on the Panama Canal and why it should be back under the control of the United States. Once again, explained by our newest Secretary of State, Marco Rubio – Audio clip taken from No Agenda Show #1736 with Adam Curry and John C Dvorak.
Attribution 4.0
Others are free to share (to copy, distribute, and transmit) and to remix the audio as long as they credit the author.
Learn moreListen to Who Should Control the Panama Canal and Why? - Explained by Marco Rubio by Audio Snippit MP3 song. Who Should Control the Panama Canal and Why? - Explained by Marco Rubio song from Audio Snippit is available on Audio.com. The duration of song is 02:38. This high-quality MP3 track has 1301.445 kbps bitrate and was uploaded on 8 Feb 2025. Stream and download Who Should Control the Panama Canal and Why? - Explained by Marco Rubio by Audio Snippit for free on Audio.com – your ultimate destination for MP3 music.
Let's go back to Rubio, who did a beautiful blurt clean up on the Panama Canal. You've just come from Panama, and you said that your meetings in Panama went well. After them, President Trump said that we're going to take the canal back, or something very powerful is going to happen. What's going to happen? That was the blurt. Or something very powerful is going to happen. I hope nothing's going to happen, and it shouldn't, because the President's point is, we gave the canal and the treaty to Panama, we didn't give it to China. You come back 20 years later, and you go to the canal, and on the entry points of both sides of the canal is a Chinese-lent company. In fact, when I was living there yesterday, the ship behind me, just over my shoulder, was a Hong Kong shipping vessel. And so their presence, not just in the canal, but in Panama writ large, is very disturbing. So leading the President, their presence, could solve this whole problem? Well, we didn't give the canal to China, I mean, it's a violation of the treaty. What I told President Maloney yesterday was that President Trump's made a preliminary determination that there's a violation of the treaty. You're in violation of the treaty because a sovereign other country, a third country, has effective control over the canal area. And that absent serious measures, we're going to have to preserve our rights under the treaty. Now, obviously, there are a lot of options in that regard, and I think people speculate things, but I don't think we'll ever get to that point, and we shouldn't get to that point. So, perfect! He is a Trump whisperer, and the solutions are already taking place. So we have a very frank conversation. Since then, they've taken some steps. They announced that they're going to get out of the Belt and Road Initiative. We'd like to see more, and we hope to see more in the days to come. You know, the government doesn't control the canal. It's run by an independent agency, the Canal Zone. So they have to go through some legal steps that they have to carry out. Yeah, we've got to go through some steps. So it's working, it's working. It's working great. They've got a third country. And I'm totally convinced that people are bishing and moaning about, for example, Rubio bailed from the upcoming G20 meeting, which was just recently announced, because he doesn't like the way South Africa is acting, which, of course, is easy enough. But I still believe that we've decided on a North-South policy, because we can do what we think we can do in Africa, and we think what we can do here and there, and we have our influence in Europe, and England is what it is. We've got to do South America. We've got to do South America, because the Chinese are moving into South America, and this is in our hemisphere. We're not putting up with it. Rubio sabika Spanish.
