
Listen to Dev2 by Annie Lafleur MP3 song. Dev2 song from Annie Lafleur is available on Audio.com. The duration of song is 10:52. This high-quality MP3 track has 128 kbps bitrate and was uploaded on 23 Apr 2026. Stream and download Dev2 by Annie Lafleur for free on Audio.com – your ultimate destination for MP3 music.










Creator Music & SFX Bundle
Making videos, streaming, podcasting, or building the next viral clip?
The Content Creator Music & SFX Bundle delivers 70 packs of hard-hitting tracks and sound effects to give your projects the fresh, pro edge they deserve.










Comment
Loading comments...
The transcription discusses the impact of false memories on forensic psychology, particularly in police investigations and court testimonies. It highlights how suggestions and manipulative techniques can lead to inaccurate memories, potentially resulting in false confessions and wrongful convictions. The role of memory flaws, source monitoring errors, and semanticization of memory are also explored. The risks of relying on repressed memories of trauma, such as childhood abuse, are emphasized, cautioning against the use of suggestive techniques like hypnosis. The conversation underscores the importance of understanding memory inaccuracies in high-stakes contexts. Ok, so I'm assuming this could cost someone's freedom if there was a misidentification in the line-up. Is there another alternative to this method? They exist for sure. In the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis. in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, in the meta-analysis, When the participants first saw that false event, most of them didn't even remember it. One of the photos depicted an event that never actually happened. It was completely fabricated, which was confirmed by the family. When the participants first saw this false event, most of them said they didn't remember it. So, the experimenters provided additional details, presenting them as if they came from a family member. So, it didn't have an effect? Not really, because a few days later, when the participants returned to the lab, something happened. They were asked to do the same task again. When they encountered the false photo a second time, some began to remember the event. Some even added their own details, blending the experimenter's description with personal elements. This shows, once again, how suggestions can clearly modify your memory through your imagination. This can create very detailed, but very inaccurate memories over some time. This ties back to the concept that I mentioned earlier, source monitoring errors. It also describes another phenomenon that I did not mention yet, semanticization of memory. As memories consolidate, they gradually lose the context in which they were formed. And yes, this can definitely impact police investigations. Imagine trying to accurately recall what you were doing 7 Tuesdays ago. It might be difficult, right? Right. For our listeners, are there other ways we could tie this to forensic psychology? Well, when false evidence is presented to suspects, they can sometimes believe they actually committed the crime. This is especially true when other manipulative or coercive techniques are used to create pressure and obtain a confession. This phenomenon is even more effective when individuals are stressed or fatigued. These techniques are no longer considered appropriate today, since they often lead people to believe these false infos. This could create instances of false confessions in some cases. Yeah, so these studies are meant to illustrate, in a laboratory setting, memory flaws. These can also occur in real-life situations, especially in high-stakes contexts like police interrogations or courtroom eyewitness testimony. Mistakes could cost innocent people's lives if they lead to false verdicts, as we discussed. Yeah, that kind of wraps it up. So far, we've talked about false memories of relatively harmless childhood events. But what about so-called memories of trauma, like childhood sexual abuse? I imagine the legal consequences could be quite serious. Yes, absolutely. And this has happened before. In some cases that were pretty controversial, especially in the 80s and the 90s, some therapeutic techniques like hypnosis and guided imagery could have caused certain issues. Research in cognitive psychology says that they could potentially be suggestible, especially when dealing with childhood traumatic experiences. This topic is still up for debate, though. It seems that imagine... Imagine... I don't understand. It's not that... Imagine... Imagining. Imagining! It sounds weird. Me too. Okay, too hard. It seems like... No. Imagining. It seems that imagining... Imagining, imagining, imagining. It seems that imagining an event can be powerful enough that later on, people may come to believe they actually lived it. However, I do want to point out three important nuances about repressed memories of adverse experiences, like, for example, child abuse. Firstly, most people who experience child abuse do remember it. Secondly, while it is possible that memories could be forgotten or repressed, the opposite can also happen. Traumatic memories can resurface into consciousness. Thirdly, it is also possible to create false memories. Because of that last point, legal cases involving alleged childhood abuse reported many years later are often approached with caution, especially if suggestion techniques like hypnosis or guided imagery were involved in the first place. This is also because wrongful convictions have occurred in the past. In some cases, therapists were even accused of malpractice. Alright, that's a good point to keep in mind. Now, for our listeners, let's do a quick recap of all the studies we mentioned today and how their results describe phenomena that impact forensic psychology. Let's go! Music jingle!
There are no comments yet.
Be the first! Share your thoughts.
